Answer:
1. Management of scientific methods
2. Progressive line
3. Speakeasy
Explanation:
1. Management of scientific methods: after the WW1, some improvement were made in regards to scientific techniques and innovations. Some new weapons were created as a result of this improvement.
2. Progressive line: this has to do with improvement in manufacturing processes in which parts are lined as semi- finished items.
3. Speakeasy: these are legal establishment after the WW1 where people tend to go to ease themselves like pubs, bars and clubs.
<span>Since the decision of the
Speaker of the House, John William McCormack, was to ask the high
chamber member Adam Clayton Powell Jr. not to take an oath, because of
the previous scandal in which Powell had been involved; If
the jury had decided in favor of Speaker McCormack, the way of operating
in the congress would have been questioned, since only one member could
be expelled according to what the constitution says, and not by the
decisions of the speaker. <span>The scope would have been very
large if it failed in McCormack's favor, giving a sense of illegality or
favoritism, and voters would feel that their representatives were not
respected.</span></span>
Kansas, situated on the American Great Plains, became the 34th state on January 29, 1861. ... This quickly led to violence,and the territory became known as “Bleeding Kansas.” Kansas has long been known as part of America's agricultural heartland, and is home to the major U.S. military installation Fort Leavenworth.
Unborn baby’s that are born in the United States have the right to be here the ones whom have not
Answer:
<h2>Hi mate PLEASE MARK ME BRAINLIEST IF MY ANSWER IS CORRECT PLEASE </h2>
Explanation:
The three-fifths compromise was an agreement reached by the state delegates at the 1787 Constitutional Convention. Under the compromise, every enslaved American would be counted as three-fifths of a person for taxation and representation purposes.
Origins of the Three-Fifths Compromise
At the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia, the founders of the United States were in the process of forming a union. Delegates agreed that the representation each state received in the House of Representatives and the Electoral College would be based on population, but the issue of slavery was a sticking point between the South and the North.
It benefitted Southern states to include enslaved people in their population counts, as that calculation would give them more seats in the House of Representatives and thus more political power. Delegates from Northern states, however, objected on the grounds that enslaved people could not vote, own property, or take advantage of the privileges that White men enjoyed. (None of the lawmakers called for the end of slavery, but some of the representatives did express their discomfort with it. George MAS on of VIRG inia called for anti-slave trade laws, and Gouverneur Morris of New York called slavery “a nefarious institution.”)
Ultimately, the delegates who objected to enslavement as an institution ignored their moral QUAL-ms in favor of unifying the states, thus leading to the creation of the three-fifths compromise.
