Answer:
D
Explanation:
Because it is your birthday
The argument does not show how peppermint oil should be used, which could lead to public rejection of this product.
We can come to this answer because:
- Coffee is a product well known by the public, who already know its effects and how to use it.
- To show a product that can completely replace the coffee of the article readers' lifetime, the author should present a product that is equivalent to coffee.
- Although the author presents peppermint oil as an alternative product to coffee, the author does not explain the usage formats and the effect of this oil.
- This promotes incorrect reasoning, as the reader will not be able to see the equivalence between the two products.
In this case, the author did not make a good comparison between the two products, as it reinforces the practicality of consuming coffee and makes peppermint oil inaccessible.
It should be remembered that the above question does not show all answer options and the options presented are incorrect.
More information:
brainly.com/question/4117438?referrer=searchResults
An editorial include an opposing viewpoint because they need to recognize it. If there is no opposing viewpoint, they look like they think there is only one side and no one else. Opposing viewpoints are very important because first, you can recognize them, and second, you can make corrections of their stance.
