Answer:
C is the correct option
Explanation:
Opportunity cost is a concept of Macroeconomic theory. It is also known as an alternative cost. It is the value of what one gives up to choose something else. In simple terms, we can say that it is the value of the road not taken. In the above question, the value of the activities one had to leave to attend the economics class woul be known as the Opprtunity cost.
Answer:
Yes we should go with this project because it has a positive NPV of $4,350
Explanation:
We need to calculate the net present value of the machine to decide whether to invest in the machine or not.
As per Given Data
Costs $270,000
Cash Inflows
Year 2 $100,000
Year 3 $150,000
Year 4 $75,000
Interest Rate = 6%
Net Present Value
As we know Net Present value is calculated by discounting each years cash flows using using the Weighted Average cost of Capital.
Year Cash Inflows Discount factor 13% Present values
Year 0 $(270,000) (1+6%)^-0 $(270,000)
Year 2 $100,000 (1+6%)^-2 $89,000
Year 3 $150,000 (1+6%)^-3 $125,943
Year 4 $75,000 (1+6%)^-4 <u>$59,407 </u>
Net present value <u>$4,350 </u>
Explanation:
Friedman defends the position that companies have a social responsibility to act to maximize profit, in the sense that, the primary function of companies is to generate profit. The author goes against the growing opinions in society that companies must have social responsibility, that is, they need to create a positive and sensitive corporate image to please political and society interests and counter or even soften the words and actions its central purpose, which is profit generation. For him, social responsibility cannot be politicized in order to be an obligation of companies, as it limits freedom and interests arising from the business.
Answer:
Protectionist.
Explanation:
Proponents of protectionist argue that allowing free trade will kill local industries and also make the country for dumping ground for cheaper foreign made goods.
They suggested imposition of heavy tariffs so as to protect local industries. Protecting local industries will create jobs for the unemployed thereby making them relevant to the society.
By imposing high tariffs, foreign companies producing those goods would pass the burden to final consumers in form of high prices hence discourage consumers from buying them. Few of those goods will then enter the country due to the heavy duty and low patronage.
Imposition of heavy tariffs will also generate more revenue for the government which will be used to financed basic infrastructures like housing, sewage system, electricity, etc.
Although proponents of free trade are of the opinion that there should be no restriction to trading among countries. They also suggested the removal of high tariffs from goods exported from other country.
The above seems good, yet the consequences outweigh the gain therein. For instance, removal of duty or tariff would result in revenue loss for the government hence unable to finance basic infrastructures. The country will also become dumping ground for imported goods because they will sold at lower price due to it's poor quality.
Answer:
$810,000
Explanation:
incremental revenues = 20,000 x $13 = $260,000
incremental direct materials costs = 20,000 x $2 = ($40,000)
incremental direct labor costs = 20,000 x $4 = ($80,000)
additional overhead costs = $200,000 x 15% = ($30,000)
additional administrative expenses = ($86,000)
incremental net income = $24,000
combined net income = incremental net income + regular net income = $24,000 + $786,000 = $810,000
