Answer:
c. cost-leadership strategy
Explanation:
Contour Autos tend to decrease the price of the product and that the quality served of the product is acceptable and not degraded. In this manner as against the normal industry the company supplies same quality goods at lower prices.
This decreases the cost for consumers and therefore, it is termed as Cost-Leadership strategy.
The Company tends to lead in the market through lower cost of goods supplied with the same quality.
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
C: a franchisee
Explanation:
One of the responsibilities of a franchisee is to bear risk of the franchisor.
A franchise is a business relationship where a firm goes into agreement with another firm to represent the former in another geographical region or service. The franchisor is the parent company while the franchisee is the independent agent.
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
Income
Explanation:
A budget shows a plan of how one will spend their income. It is, therefore, a plan of expenditure.  A budget shows total expected income on one side and projected expenditure on the other side. The budget is balanced when income and expenses are equal.
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
generic goods.
Explanation:
Generic goods - 
It refers to the type of packaging , where only the type of product present inside the packet is written , rather than specifying the name of the brand , is referred to as generic goods . 
For example , 
Mentioning the package with rice , cola , beans etc. , is the example of generic food . 
Hence , from the given scenario of the question , 
The correct answer is generic goods . 
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer: conducted substantial business with Ohio residents through the Web site.
Explanation: The sliding - scale standard confirms when exercising jurisdiction over an out of state defendant is allowed. It is only allowed when significant business has been conducted by this out of state company over the Internet with another state. In this case the out of state defendant is Trading Post, a Washington company, and it has dealt in transactions over the Internet with the state of Ohio via its website. Because the business conducted in Ohio is significant, it gives Robert the grounds to sue Trading Post, even though Trading Post is not based in the same state as Robert.