Answer:
No impairment loss would be reported
Explanation:
The computation is shown below;
Impairment loss = carrying value - recoverable amount
Where,
The recoverable amount would be the higher amount of fair market value and value in use
So the recoverable amount would be $2,545,000
Now the impairment loss is
= $2,500,000 - $2,545,000
= -$45,000
Since the impairment loss comes in negative so no impairment would be recorded
Answer:
Net income increase - $4,890
Explanation:
The computation of the effect on net income is shown below:
= Number of pounds of inferior product × (standard price for the materials - inferior product price per pound)
= 3,000 pounds × ($13 - $11.37)
= 3,000 pounds × $1.63
= $4,890 increase
For determining the effect we took the difference of the prices and then multiply it with the number of pounds of the inferior product
Answer:
A $300
Explanation:
$90-$82= $8
$8-$5= $3
Therefore:
$3×100 shares =$300
The holder has bought the right to buy the stock at $90 per share because She bought this right for a premium of $5 per share. By exercising the call, the holder buys the stock at $90 and in which he /she sells the stock in the market at $82, for a 8 point loss. Since $5 points was paid in premiums, the net loss is 3 points or $300 on the contract covering 100 shares.
THE ANSWER IS .....
B.INITIATIVE
Answer:
A) leveraging new core competencies to improve current market position.
Explanation:
As is given in the scenario, the people that the company Ancho is trying to get are <em>potential customers</em> rather than existing, hence they cannot be said to be building new core competencies <em>to protect and extend current market position</em>. That would have been the case if they were trying to keep those that were already customers to the company.
Ancho cannot also be said to be <em>redeploying existing core competencies to compete in future markets </em>because they are actually acquiring new competencies in electric car manufacturing which was not their original line of business.
There is also no case of <em>unlearning existing core competencies </em>because Anchor has deployed existing competencies in developing a hybrid car rather than just an electric one.
Hence Anchor is trying to get new customers while keeping the old ones and has made a car that will appeal to both existing and potential customers to improve current market position.
