1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lana [24]
1 year ago
13

To determine whether a piece of historical evidence is reliable, historians

History
1 answer:
matrenka [14]1 year ago
3 0

When historians need to determine whether a piece of historical evidence is reliable, they C. check to see if the information in the source is confirmed by other sources.

<h3>How do historians determine the reliability of historical evidence?</h3>

The best way to be sure that a piece of evidence of any kind is reliable, is to check the number of sources that support this piece of evidence. The higher the number of sources, the more reliable the evidence is.

This is what is used by historians when they need to find out how reliable information is. They check to see if the information is confirmed by other historical sources.

Find out more on checking for historical reliability at brainly.com/question/11808888

#SPJ1

You might be interested in
How are the American and French revolutions different? name one political and one economic reason
Leviafan [203]

Answer:

The American revolution was inextricably linked with the transformations of the late 18th century, which also took place on the European continent. In time, it almost coincided with the French Revolution, and historically its origin is largely due to the same reasons. Therefore, in the literature these revolutions are often compared. In the question of the origin of the French Revolution, the situational factor is particularly distinguished. The American revolution is interpreted as part of a broad transition period. Both revolutions are interpreted in the context of the theory of clash and change of elites.

First of all, it should be emphasized that the American revolution proceeded under different historical conditions than the French one. While France was a country with a deep historical tradition and centuries-old culture, young America, or rather, the English colonies in America, were relatively recently settled, had not yet had time to acquire traditions and had just begun to create their own culture.

In the American and French revolutions that took place almost at the same time, two essentially opposite concepts prevailed - “checks and balances” and “common will.”.

The American Revolution was a movement based on ideas persistently rethought by the most serious of men in the process of creating a new nation, which was destined to become the freest and most successful community of people in the history of mankind.

The French Revolution was a protest of an angry crowd. It met the desperate resistance of the old classes, and to break it, the merciless dictatorship of the Jacobins was required. The Jacobin dictatorship and the speeches of the plebeian masses were the peak of the revolutionary upsurge in France. The American revolution did not know this kind of phenomenon, and the destruction of the old order did not require such significant efforts.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
New neverland governor who refused to surrender to england
LiRa [457]
Peter Stuyvesant is the governor who refused to surrender to England
3 0
3 years ago
Which of the highlighted locations (marked blue) would have had the greatest chance of escaping the bubonic plague?
muminat

Answer:

the one in the top right corner.

Explanation:

because it is furthest from the rest.

this should be it, sorry if it's not!

7 0
3 years ago
Which of these represents bias in historical materials?1( leaving out the viewpoint of an enemy of war) 2(presenting ideas of bo
bixtya [17]

Answer: The answer is ( leaving out the viewpoint of an enemy of war)

Explanation:This is because when you only hear from one side of a war then that means you only get their side of the story without considering the other party, this means there are always two sides to a story told( story told in only one perspective )

3 0
3 years ago
How did the Zhou Dynasty use religion to justify overthrowing the Shang Dynasty?
xz_007 [3.2K]
The Zhou Dynasty used the notion of the Mandate of Heaven to defend the overthrow of the Shang Dynasty. The "Mandate of Heaven" is an earliest Chinese philosophical concept, which was created during the Zhou Dynasty(1046-256 BCE). The Mandate of Heaven decides whether a ruler of China is satisfactorily righteous to lead; if he does not accomplish his responsibilities as an emperor, then he fails the Mandate and thus the right to be emperor.  Zhou leaders appealed that the Shang emperors had become fraudulent and unfit, so Heaven commanded their removal.
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 10. Compare and contrast the nomadic civilizations that
    9·1 answer
  • Third parties play a highly important role in the:
    9·1 answer
  • Suppose you work for a government agency that regulates the buying and selling in the country which main purpose of government i
    9·1 answer
  • Explain how the name of actors originated in Ancient Greece,including the history of theater and the root word.
    7·1 answer
  • How would bee venom and wasp venom react with litmus paper
    7·1 answer
  • The Seneca Falls Convention was the beginning of
    7·2 answers
  • Approximately when was the end of the last ice age in world history
    14·1 answer
  • Why did many Americans want to remain neutral at the beginning of World War II?
    7·1 answer
  • On the map, choose the nation where the effects of the Black Death led to a revolt.
    8·2 answers
  • How can a map of the Pueblos be an example of place in geography?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!