When historians need to determine whether a piece of historical evidence is reliable, they C. check to see if the information in the source is confirmed by other sources.
<h3>How do historians determine the reliability of historical evidence?</h3>
The best way to be sure that a piece of evidence of any kind is reliable, is to check the number of sources that support this piece of evidence. The higher the number of sources, the more reliable the evidence is.
This is what is used by historians when they need to find out how reliable information is. They check to see if the information is confirmed by other historical sources.
There has been a debate about border control. Donald Trump wants to take action through buidling a wall along the border but the democrats do not want this. This creates a policy gridlock, where no policy is passed due to each party not wanting the other party to get its way.
As the country dragged into chaos and civil war the British played Indian National Congress and Muslim League off one another. Thus inevitably long term commitment of British to Indian unity was no longer valid.
