The correct answer to this question is D. This is because A, implies that the Declaration of Independece guarantees the individual rights, but it briefly mentions some of this freedoms, such as those of life, liberty and the pursuit of hapiness in order to argue the reaons why the decision of the States to declare themselves independent from the British Crown, so it does not really explain these rights.
Regarding B, the bill of rights, that is, the first 10 Ammendments of the Constitution, does not deal with the reasons for revolution, as this body of ammendments is the result of the evolution of the society, its needs and demands: they were created along the time, as a result of a process, so they are not entirely linked to the reasons for the revolution.
And finally, C probably best describes the Constitution, which is the one that creates the Government as it certainly outlines its structure as we see it today, and in any case replaces the Declaration of Independence which doesn´t really deal with the creation of the Government.
As a conclusion, the Declaration of Independence is the political statement which sets the will of the new nation, whereas the Constitution, as the result of this initial statement, creates the Government, that at the same time, recognizes the individual rights as an expression of the Declaration and is adopted by the Constitution to guarantee the enforceability of these Rights.
Answer:
Common Sense, written by Thomas Paine and first published in Philadelphia in January 1776, was in part a scathing polemic against the injustice of rule by a king. 'Common Sense,' published in 1776, inspired American colonists to declare independence from England.
Explanation:
Answer:
They became more concerned with foreign policy.
Explanation:
The tenth commemoration of the 9/11 assaults has turned into an event for reconsidering the fear mongering danger to the United States. Three key inquiries have been raised. What is the status and current quality of al-Qa'ida, the gathering that executed 9/11? Have measures taken since 9/11 made Americans any more secure today? Why has the United States not been assaulted once more—in any event in the feeling of being assaulted on a scale moving toward 9/11? These are beneficial inquiries, despite the fact that they each include a confined point of view toward psychological oppression and counterterrorism. The first is naturally constrained by being centered around just a solitary assortment of fear mongering or even only a solitary gathering. The second more often than not precludes reference to any standard of progress and disappointment in verifying Americans from psychological oppression or to the expenses and exchange offs involved in getting a given level of wellbeing. The third inquiry is normally longing for a clarification that would be too easy to even think about being a precise examination of what has decided the measure of psychological oppression coordinated against the United States during the previous decade.
Hi,
Jay's Treaty was unpopular because it really didn't resolve anything between America and Britain.
