Answer:
Explanation:
First scenario: The answer is No, not many sellers. The drug of the pharmaceutical company has patent right and it is the only firm selling this product. This makes the company a monopolist (single seller)
Second scenario: No, not an identical product. Cable company and phone company produce different products. Cable companies majorly deal with television access.
Third Scenario: no, not many sellers. One firm is dominating the market and customers prefers this. Its product has been differentiated and it can charge its own price.
Fourth scenario: yes,meets all assumptions. The socks are identical and consumers do not care about the seller because the same utility will be derived from the socks.
Answer:
?? what do u mean do u need help with something!
Answer:
"No" is the correct response. A further explanation is provided below.
Explanation:
- Along with comparison to the average individual or working people although the CEO seems to be the top-level title than the worker or contractor. Consequently, the compensation of such a CEO's job is not compared with the compensation of that same typical individual employee business throughout the firm.
- This behavior would be not only ethically reprehensible but economically accountable for such SEC regulation lobbying. SEC guidelines don’t mandate their CEO's proportion towards the average worker to be reported.
Thus, the above is the correct response.
Answer:
<em>All other variables held constant, investments paying simple interest have to pay significantly higher interest rates to earn the same amount of interest as an account earning compound interest.</em><u><em> </em></u><u>TRUE. </u>
This is a true statement because compound interest is based on the previous balance in addition to the interest earnings on the balance. It therefore accrues on a higher balance than simple interest which builds on the same amount of principal throughout. Simple interest would therefore need a higher rate to bridge this gap.
<em>Everything else held constant, an account that earns compound interest will grow more quickly than an otherwise identical account that earns simple interest.</em> <u>TRUE. </u>
An account earning compound interest would increase faster than an identical one using simple interest because compound interest is based on an accrued balance whilst simple interest does not change the balance it is based on.
<em>All other factors being equal, both the simple interest and the compound interest methods will accrue the same amount of earned interest by the end of the first year.</em> <u>TRUE. </u>
At the end of the first year, an assuming yearly compounding, both simple and compound interest will yield the same result because they would be based on the same principal amount.
Answer:
from the given options, the answer is b. outside creditors; limited partners' profits; limited partners' capital; general partners' advances; general partners' profit; general partners' capital
Explanation:
This happens usually when the partenrship is dissolved. Then the assets must cover all the obligations the firm has.
it starts from the external creditors, and slowly goes to Limited Partner, who has more right to recieve funds than the general partners. This is because the limited parter is only liable for his amount of contribution.
Only after satisfying all the external obligations the general partners have the ability to pay themselves!