Question

This article replicated and extended Milgram’s Obedience Study. List 3 ways in which Shanab & Yahya’s (1977) study was different from Milgram’s original test of obedience. (3)

Answer 1

The following are three ways in which Shanab and Yahya's (1977) study differed from Milgram's original test of obedience.

• Shanab and Yahya conducted their experiment on Jordanian children, whereas Milgram conducted his research on people aged 20 to 50.

• Shanab and Yahya compared different age groups to see if there was a statistically significant difference in obedience. The age groups were as follows: 6 to 8, 10 to 12, and 14 to 16 years old. Milgram did not make any age group comparisons.

• Shanab and Yahya used a 2x2x3 research design to investigate differences in gender, age groups, and two types of punishment commands. Milgram only looked at one variable.

Thus these are the three ways in which Shanab & Yahya’s (1977) study was different from Milgram’s original test of obedience.

To learn more about Milgram’s original test of obedience, refer: brainly.com/question/3770866

#SPJ9

Answer 2

The following are three differences between Shanab and Yahya's (1977) study and Milgram's initial obedience test.

• Shanab and Yahya conducted their study on Jordanian children, whereas Milgram studied persons aged 20 to 50.

• Shanab and Yahya evaluated obedience levels across age groups to see if there was a statistically significant difference. The age ranges were 6 to 8, 10 to 12, and 14 to 16 years old. Milgram made no age group comparisons.

• Shanab and Yahya investigated gender, age group, and two forms of punishment directives using a 2x2x3 research design. Milgram only examined one variable.

These are the three ways in which Shanab and Yahya's (1977) study differed from Milgram's original obedience test.

Refer here to learn more about Milgram’s original test of obedience: brainly.com/question/3770866

#SPJ9