Answer:
Solar flux that incident on it is given as
S = 160 W/m/m
Now we know that the area of solar panels is given as
A = 10 m^2
So total solar power received by solar panels is given as
Power Received = (Solar flux) \times (Area)PowerReceived=(Solarflux)×(Area)
P = S\times AP=S×A
now here we have
P = 160 \times 10P=160×10
P = 1600 WP=1600W
now we know that efficiency of the solar panels is 20%
so total output power will be
efficiency = \frac{P_{out}}{P_{in}}efficiency=
P
in
P
out
0.20 = \frac{P_{out}}{1600}0.20=
1600
P
out
P_{out} = 320 WP
out
=320W
Answer: I think the answer is C lol
Explanation:
Which best describes how the excerpt appeals to readers’ emotions?
The excerpt provides facts about the tree, which impresses readers’ scientific minds.The excerpt describes how the tree traveled to London, which excites the readers’ sense of adventure.The excerpt compares the tree to a person, which makes readers feel sympathetic toward the tree.<span>The excerpt explains how to skin a tree, which makes readers feel awed at the height of the tree.</span>
The impact of migration from 2010 to 2017 created a large increase in immigrants in the continents of Africa and Europe.
During 2010-17 due to the expansion of population there was growth of slums and asylums.
- Most of the sub-Saharan moved to the European Union nations such as Norway and Sweden. Thus an over a seven-year period these refugees Most of the migrants came from Nigeria, Ghana, and Kenya.
- The possible impacts that the migrants made were seen in terms of financial support and gains.
Hence option B is correct, as more emigrants sent money home, this money helped in the growth of their country of origin.
Learn more about the From 2010 through 2017 there was a large increase in the number of migrants from Africa to Europe.
brainly.com/question/24814483.
Answer:
Option D, might fall, but we cannot know without more information
Explanation:
Complete question
If real GDP falls by 2% while work hours fall by 10%, then labor productivity:
a. falls
b. is unchanged
c. rises
d. might fall, but we cannot know without more information
Solution -
As we know
Productivity is equal to Real GDP/ Total Hours Worked. This means that if working hours of the labor force reduces then the productivity will rise.
Here GDP also falls but compared to the total working hours the fall of GDP is 1/5. Hence, the productivity might fall/rise as compared to the case when neither the GDP nor the working hours were falling.
Hence, option D is correct
