The use of violence in politics became commonplace. There is consensus among historians that the time beginning with the savage deaths of the Gracchi and culminating with the murder of Julius Caesar in 44 BCE was the period of the Roman Republic's downfall. Upon his death, Augustus Caesar became the first Roman emperor. This is further explained below.
<h3>Who are the Gracchi brothers?</h3>
Generally, Two Roman brothers, the Gracchi brothers were named after their father, the consul in 177 BC, Tiberius Sempronius Gracchus.
In conclusion, As a result, political violence became commonplace. A large number of historians place the beginning of the collapse of the Roman Republic with the savage deaths of the Gracchi in 63 BCE and its conclusion with the murder of Julius Caesar in 44 BCE. This murder led to the ascent of Augustus Caesar as the first Roman emperor.
Read more about the Gracchi brothers
brainly.com/question/24194837
#SPJ1
<span><span>Jewish law is the focus of many passages in the Gospels. According to one set, especially prominent in the Sermon on the Mount (Matthew 5–7), Jesus admonished his followers to observe the law unwaveringly (Matthew 5:17–48). According to another set, he did not adhere strictly to the law himself and even transgressed current opinions about some aspects of it, especially the Sabbath (e.g., Mark 3:1–5). It is conceivable that both were true, that he was extremely strict about marriage and divorce (Matthew 5:31–32; Mark 10:2–12) but less stringent about the Sabbath. The study of Jesus and the law is, like any other study of law, highly technical. In general, the legal disputes in the Gospels fall within the parameters of those of 1st-century Judaism. Some opposed minor healing on the Sabbath (such as Jesus is depicted as performing), but others permitted it. Similarly, the Sadducees regarded the Pharisees’ observance of the Sabbath as too lax. There also were many disagreements in 1st-century Judaism about purity. While some Jews washed their hands before eating (Mark 7:5), others did not; however, this conflict was not nearly as serious as that between the Shammaites and the Hillelites (the two main parties within Pharisaism) over menstrual purity. It is noteworthy that Jesus did not oppose the purity laws. On the contrary, according to Mark 1:40–44, he accepted the Mosaic laws on the purification of lepers (Leviticus 14).</span></span>
Answer:
Fort McCullough
Let me know if this is helpful
Thanks!
:)
Explanation:
Well, all dynasties wanted China to restore order. So I will go with D. All of the above,
Answer:
Confederate coffers being so low, little food or other aid could be provided for Indians struggling with the challenges of a wartime economy. In addition, after the Civil War ended, Native American tribes and nations that fought with the Confederacy had their treaties with the federal government nullified.
Explanation:
