it is exspensive and the benefits change on a yearly range
Answer:
The doctrine was called the Manifest Destiny.
Explanation:
As an area that has fought for independence from colonialization and European powers, governments from CARICOM (Caribbean Communities Organization) countries provide funding to support the region's cultural practices for multiple reasons.
According to the CARICOM Regional Cultural Policy, the three main reasons for government funding toward cultural support include: to provide people who are trained in the arts and other areas of culture, to establish and maintain cultural preservation institutions, and to ensure proper management of cultural institutions and heritage.
Doing the aforementioned things will ensure that care is taken to preserve the cultural heritage of an area that has received much interaction and assimilation with world powers. This interaction can be threatening to the stability of cultural preservation by those who may be ignorant, and/or untrained, in the preservation important heritage factors. The CARICOM nations are also striving to maintain independence and ensure during the development process in developing Caribbean countries that they may remain self-sufficient.
Critical thinking could be used in this example to actively engage with the proposition and propose an alternative or another proposition. Maybe in my own life experience I've known women who drive better than man, so I already have first hand example of how this is a misbelieve, but in order to prove this i have to go a step further.
---
Skepticism should refrain us from making statement from things we don't know yet. The proposition is a generality and thus already tell us that is a prejudice, but moreover when we are talking about things without having knowledge is a good scientific practise to step back and know the argument before speaking.
---
Objectivity is what we should aim when examine datas and proposition. Once we have the data, we could objectevely tell if this proposition respects the truth or not. Some importance should also be given to the motivation and the qualitative data, and not only the raw quantitative data, as reading and analyse only one type could lead to more misunderstading.
---
Curiosity is what we should always bring to the table in everyday matter. In the proposition, we could step back and ask why this is a well consolidates rumour, or why are the reasons behind this saying. Curiosity should be the driven to explain the world in a more complex and rich way comparing to the way other people may live.
---
Other examples of proposition that could be examine by the scientific approach are almost endless. "Women are not good at STEM fields" for example, or "Men generally are more qualified leaders". It is possible to argue that every proposition could be examine in a scientific approach, and maybe we all should do it so.
It depends on the state. In Florida, it is 4 points. In Virginia, it is 6 points. Hope i helped.
