I need help with this questions?

English

1 answer:

Katen [24]1 year ago

4 0

It is false that everyone wanted to be Justin's friend and it is incorrect to say that someone who loves all around them are people who embrace bigotry.

<h3>What is the meaning of "pariah"?</h3>

A pariah is someone who is rejected by society, someone with whom people do not wish to have any involvement. Therefore, if Justin is treated like a pariah, that means people do not want to be friends with him. Therefore, the answer to the first question is false.

<h3>What is the meaning of bigotry?</h3>

Bigotry is, simply put, prejudice. A person who embraces bigotry is someone who judges others based on their belonging to a group, race, gender, nationality, etc.

The person described in the second question is someone who loves and accepts all around them, no matter who they are. Therefore, this is not a person who embraces bigotry.

We can thus conclude that the answer provided above are correct.

Learn more about bigotry here:

brainly.com/question/28220660

#SPJ1

You might be interested in

Why does the author most likely include information about the Antarctica treaty in lines 7 through 9 of the article?

Lerok [7]

They are: to demilitarize Antarctica, to establish it as a zone free of nuclear tests and the disposal of radioactive waste, and to ensure that it is used for peaceful purposes only; to promote international scientific cooperation in Antarctica; to set aside disputes over territorial sovereignty

5 0

2 years ago

Which scenarios are considered ethically acceptable for journalists? Select three options. a) paying money to attend a conferenc

lana [24]

Answer:

<u>Step 1: Determine which options are correct </u>

<em>Which scenarios are considered ethically acceptable for journalists? Select three options/ </em>

- Option A: paying money to attend a conference about climate change in order to do research for an article

- Option C: ending an investigation because it may lead to violence and disunity in a local community

- Option D: interviewing the CEOs of two insurance companies that are competing against each other

Option B doesn't make sense because if you are getting paid by a politician, that can further produce bias which can then lead to false things being spoke/written. Option E doesn't make sense because if you use information from a wiki page, that source is not verified which means that the source is unreliable. Therefore, the correct options are A, C, and D.

<u>Look at attachment</u>