By inference, the way in which Zaroff is portrayed as Rainsford’s foil is that: "Zaroff is a person without a conscience, but Rainsford has one." (Option B)
<h3>What is the explanation for the above inference?</h3>
As evidenced by the excerpt, Zaroff is not opposed to murdering others, which he regards as a form of hunting.
He has no regard for human life and is unconcerned whether they live or die, which distinguishes his character from Rainsford's.
Learn more about inference at;
brainly.com/question/25913650
#SPJ1
The answer is definitely: "And so it piled up to the ceilings" since the author is using exaggeration as a literary technique to make the situation seem even worse than it is.
I hope this answer helps you :)!
Answer:
Loyalty and betrayal are both minor themes linked to the more prominent themes of servitude versus freedom, in the Tempest. ... Antonio betrayed his brother and stole the dukedom of Milan from him while he (Prospero) was studying. Being the loyal man that he is, Prospero did not expect his brother evil grab for power.
Explanation:
