Answer:https://www.austincc.edu/lpatrick/his1693/causes.html
Explanation:
I believe this will help
People receive income by exchanging human resources for WAGES or SALARIES.
Wages are a form of income where a worker is paid a certain amount per hour for each hour of work performed. You might punch a time clock and are paid for the hours and minutes spent on the job. For example, you take a job working at a fast-food restaurant for $10 and hour, and work twenty hours a week. So each week you'd be earning $200 in wages. (That would be your gross income. After taxes and any other deductions are taken out, your net income would be the amount deposited to your bank account.)
Salaried employees are paid an agreed-upon amount each week/month/year. They don't keep track of their hours in precise fashion. They're likely expected to work a full 40-hour work week, and might work added hours if needed to cover the needs of the workplace. For example, the manager of the fast food restaurant where you work for wages might be paid on a salary basis. He or she might come in early or stay late to make sure things are running well, and isn't punching a time clock each time in or out. The manager might be paid a salary of $35,000 annually (for the sake of example in this scenario).
Answer:
Participating in politics would distract women from their families and their duties in the home.
Making informed political decisions required a level of intelligence that many believed women did not have.
Depending on a man was seen as feminine and acceptable, and independent thinking challenged that ideal.
Explanation:
Did it in Edgenuity
<span>The Supreme Court is most likely to be accused of judicial activism in cases involving: protection of individual rights.
Writing for the conservative group, <em>The Heritage Foundation</em>, Elizabeth Slattery defines judicial activism as "w</span><span>hen judges fail to apply the Constitution or laws impartially according to their original public meaning, regardless of the outcome, or do not follow binding precedent of a higher court and instead decide the case based on personal preference."
Cases involving individual rights are likely to elicit charges of judicial activism because the Constitution does not spell out each and every sort of right citizens may have. New questions come up that were not considered or specified at the time the Constitution was written. For instance, <em>Roe v. Wade </em>(1973) addressed the question of abortion and an individual's right to privacy. <em>Obergefell v. Hodges </em>(2015) addressed the legality of same-sex marriage. Both are cases of individual rights, where the Constitution did not give direct instruction on the issues at stake. The decisions on those issues, to allow abortion and to allow same-sex marriage, both are criticized by conservatives as instances of judicial activism.</span>
