The Miranda decision so controversial because the Miranda ruling was criticized for substantially weakening police enforcement in the name of defending people's rights. The Miranda protections' potential range was somewhat constrained by later Supreme Court rulings.
<h3>What was the Miranda v. Arizona case's justification?</h3>
Miranda's rights to remain silent and to legal representation under the Fifth and Sixth Amendments were both flagrantly violated by the police.
In accordance with the Fifth Amendment, police must inform suspects who are being interrogated while they are in custody of their right to remain quiet and to see an attorney.
Hence, The Supreme Court ruled in the famous Miranda v. Arizona (1966) case that police must advise anyone they arrest of their constitutional rights.
Learn more about Miranda v. Arizona from
brainly.com/question/4429252
#SPJ4