<u>Answer:</u>
<em>The EPA and NASA were formed as an </em><u><em>executive agency
</em></u>
<u><em></em></u>
<u>Explanation:</u>
NASA was shaped in 1958 when Congress passed the National Aeronautics Act while EPA describes the Protection of Environmental Agency. President Richard Nixon formed it in 1970 through an official request.
Both the EPA and NASA were framed as official organizations under the influence and backing of the U.S. Government. This implies they work under the offices in mid-1970, because of increased open worries about breaking down city air, common regions covered with garbage, and urban water supplies tainted with risky debasements.
Answer:
The point of view of the author establishes that humans are the biggest threat to sea otters because they endanger the environment of the sea otters and don't rebuild it.
Explanation:
First of all, if we understand the author's perspective we can see that he claims sea otters have lived in environments with strong human influence. That has made them look for their own space and to migrate to look for places where they can live. Making them run risks in a journey and clashing with other species, as well as with them. Factories, immoderate logging, hunting, breaking of the food chain. Humans have had a very large and negative impact on them, without doing enough efforts to fix their effects on the sea otter's habitats.
Answer:
The soldier is pointing out that:
a) It is often conflicting.
Explanation:
If people who are fighting against you open fire and kill you, we can say you were killed by enemy fire, since it was the enemy who shot. Thus, friendly fire means being killed by your friends, not by your enemy. However, <u>when the soldier says, "I don't know why they call it friendly fire if it kills you," he is paying more attention to the literal meaning of "friendly". "Friendly" can refer to people who are nice and kind. But it can also refer to something that is not harmful. If a product does not harm nature, we say it is environment-friendly. From this perspective, it does seem weird to call "friendly fire" something that is harmful, that can kill you. Thus, to this soldier, terminology used at war seems conflicting.</u>
Answer:
Considering the real life story "The Story Behind the Cask of Amontillado" and Poe's "The Cask of Amontillado" bear striking similarities.
In the real life version, a spiteful army Captain kills a young Lieutenant. The pals of the latter sells him drinks and take him to a dungeon where they bind him and seal him up inside alive. No one figured out the enigma behind his vanishing and his body wasn't found till years later.
Poe uses this real life story to create a fiendish portrait of a man who is willing to go to the same length to seek revenge. Poe's protagonist uses the same method to kill his enemy and is never caught either.
Differences:
In the real life version, the soldiers are hot headed young men who want to take vengeance for their friend's untimely death. In Poe's story, however, Montresor is a cold-blooded killer who enjoys executing every moment of his sinister plan. Also, his victim's crime was merely insulting him on some occasion.
Explanation:
