The Anti-Federalists were most concerned with the fact that the Constitution was giving far too much power to the central government over the states--meaning that they feared the federal government would become tyrannical.
Answer:
Explanation:
Essay Segment or Quote Rubric Rating Comments
Briefly describe ONE major difference between Nash’s and Maier’s historical interpretations of the origins of the American Revolution.
Briefly explain how ONE specific historical event or development from the period 1754–1800 that is not explicitly mentioned in the excerpts could be used to support Nash’s argument.
Briefly explain how ONE specific historical event or development from the period 1754–1800 that is not explicitly mentioned in the excerpts could be used to support Maier’s argument.
3
2
1
The response to (a) did not earn a point because it is does not adequately describe the arguments of Nash and Maier. It merely lists the idea that Maier believed the Revolution emerged from old ideas, and Nash believed the Revolution was based on new ideas.
The response to (b) earned 1 point by providing evidence that the Boston Tea Party was a specific event that demonstrated the colonists’ rebellion against Great Britain’s taxation, which supports Nash’s argument. The response to
(c) did not earn a point because the Boston Massacre does not support Maier’s argument that the Revolution originated from earlier revolutionary thought.
B) Whigs
I just had that question hope it helps
Answer:
Yes both sides are divided.
Explanation:
If you look at the ending of the statement Samuel made, "Our enemy in this country." is referring to Britain as the enemy, and the ending of the second speaker, "There goes another load of rebels." means that the people with Britain are killing off or are happy about the rebels (people with Samuel Adams) dying.
It's the former practice of segregating black people in the US.
