Answer:
For y(-7) =6.4
The largest interval is between
For y(-2.5) = -0.5.
The largest interval is between
For y(0) = 0
The largest interval is between
For y(4.5) = -2.1.
The largest interval is between
For y(14)= 1.7.
The largest interval is between
Step-by-step explanation:
From m the question we are told that
The first order differential equation is 
Now the first step is to obtain the domain of the differential equation
Now to do that let consider the denominators
Now generally
side calculation
=> 
Also 
=> 
This means that this first order differential equation is discontinuous at
So
For y(-7) =6.4
The largest interval is between
For y(-2.5) = -0.5.
The largest interval is between
For y(0) = 0
The largest interval is between
For y(4.5) = -2.1.
The largest interval is between
For y(14)= 1.7.
The largest interval is between
As <GNJ & < JNK form a striaght angle
And < JNK = 90°
So <GNJ = 90°
So <GNH + <HNJ = 90°
So GNH & HNJ are complimentary is true.
As JNK and KNL do not form a straight angle.
So <JNK +< KNL is not equal to 180°.
Hence JNK and KNL are supplementary is not true.
As <KNM & < JNK form a straight angle
And < JNK = 90°
So <KNM = 90°
So <KNL + <LNM = 90°
So KNL & LNM are complimentary is true.
As HNL makes a straight angle
And so
mHNK + mKNL = 180° is true
As MNG itself is 90°
So
<MNG + <GNH cannot be 90° hence this is false.
If there are no duplications among the six numbers, then they sit at
<em>six different points</em> on the number line.
Irrational numbers are on the same number line as rational ones.
The only difference is that if somebody comes along, points at one of them,
and asks you to tell him its EXACT location on the line, you can answer him
with digits and a fraction bar if it's a rational one, but not if it's an irrational one.
For example:
Here are some rational numbers. You can describe any of these EXACTLY
with digits and/or a fraction bar:
-- 2
-- 1/2
-- (any whole number) divided by (any other whole number)
(this is the definition of a rational number)
-- 19
-- (any number you can write with digits) raised to
(any positive whole-number power)
-- 387
-- 4.0001
-- (zero or any integer) plus (zero or any repeating decimal)
-- 13.14159 26535 89792
-- (any whole number) + (any decimal that ends, no matter how long it is)
(this doesn't mean that a never-ending decimal isn't rational; it only
means that a decimal that ends IS rational.
Having an end is <em><u>enough</u></em> to guarantee that a decimal is rational,
but it's not <em><u>necessary</u></em> in order for the decimal to be rational.
There are a huge number of decimals that are rational but never end.
Like the decimal forms of 1/3, 1/6, 1/7, 1/9, 1/11, etc.)
--> the negative of anything on this list
Here are some irrational numbers. Using only digits, fraction bar, and
decimal point, you can describe any of these <em><u>as close</u></em> as anybody wants
to know it, but you can never write EXACTLY what it is:
-- pi
-- square root of √2
-- any multiple of √2
-- any fraction of √2
-- e
-- almost any logarithm
You can set them equal to each other so -3x+4=4x-10 and then you add 3x and 10 on both sides and get7x=14 and then divided both sides by 7 and get x = 2 and check by plugging in and you get -2 for y on both so solution is x=2
Answer:
m=2 (0,4)
Step-by-step explanation:
