to ensure plenty of spontaneity and flexibility in a speech, a speaker should keep rehearsal to a minimum.

English

1 answer:

hoa [83]1 year ago

7 0

Last time, I urged for more spontaneous public conversation and unscripted statements as a way to end the post.

Several readers responded to this appeal for spontaneity by writing in to ask how one may "learn to improvise." Should we not plan as much and instead focus on being more spontaneous if speaking "off the cuff" makes us appear honest and genuine?

Even though I had intended to write on something quite different this week, these inquiries brought me back to this subject. I'll thus attempt to clarify the connection between preparation and the capacity to vary from one's "script" in this post and maybe the one after that.

I would like to make two issues clear in relation to my opinions on improvisation.

To start, I want to be clear about how I'm using the phrase. I'm referring about improvisation, which is the ability to change one's planned statements in response to the situation, especially while interacting with the audience. This kind of spontaneity occurs when a speaker is comfortable enough with the speech to decide to modify the intended wording or take a new direction mid-speech, as Martin Luther King did in his "I have a dream" address. This phenomena is distinct from what I refer to as pure improvisation. Naturally, when I discuss public speaking, I do not mean the kind of Pure improvisation in "improv theatre," in which actors make up scenes on the fly using just audience members' random thoughts and phrases with no prior planning.

My second explanation is as follows: The type of improvisation I recommend for speakers only occurs when the orator has mastered the subject at hand via several hours of deliberate preparation. The finest improvisers I've encountered were typically the presenters who prepared the most in- depthly.

Learn more about spontaneity brainly.com/question/28180293

#SPJ4

You might be interested in

How does Jem in to kill a mocking bird mature and is no longer making child decision but acting like an adult?

Dahasolnce [82]

Jem matures by reflecting on thoughts and ideas, maturing herself to fit in and thrive in the reality she is upon.

7 0

3 years ago

Which sentence in the excerpt supports the claim that the American colonies could thrive independently from Britain?

viva [34]

C) But even this is admitting more than is true, for I answer roundly, that America would have flourished as much, and probably much more, had no European power had anything to do with her. thus option C is correct.

<h3>Why British rule of American colonies?</h3>

Although each colony had its own government, the British king maintained power over them. Many colonists were irate by the 1770s because they lacked self-government. This implied that they were unable to rule themselves and establish their own rules. The king demanded that they pay enormous taxes.

According to Paine's claim in Option C, America would have actually been better off if it had not been under British rule. According to him, America's progress and ability to prosper even more were really hampered by its rule by the British. Both options A and B make the case that America needs Britain to succeed. Option A claims that for America to be happy, a relationship with Britain is crucial. America is compared to a child in Option B. According to this, a child should never consume meat if they can get by on milk alone. America should therefore just require Britain. Although Paine evidently finds this absurd, the premise does not support the claim.