Answer:
Punitive damages are intended to punish the wrongdoer and discourage others from engaging in similar conduct in the future.
Explanation:
Punitive damages are the damages which are granted to the defendant to punish for the heinous conduct and to set an example for the others intending to commit such a crime in future. Such punishments are not awarded frequently but are only restricted to certain cases, especially under tort law.
This is a compound sentence, because there are two independent clauses here: 1. Stone bridges are strong + but 2. (strong bridges) are costly to build.
The conjunction 'but' connects two independent clauses, and a compound sentence contains at least two independent clauses, whereas a simple sentence has only one.
Could I see the sentence?
I think Macbeth is more anxious about murdering King Duncan. He becomes paranoid in the moments leading up to him killing the King, such as hearing spirits saying that he has "murdered sleep" and cannot speak the name of God. He hallucinates a dagger, as well and is only really able to produce enough courage to kill King Duncan when Lady Macbeth pressures him into doing it, calling him cowardly.
Lady Macbeth also says to Macbeth that if he is too scared to kill Duncan, she will do it herself. Shakespeare writes Lady Macbeth as a ruthless character, and she doesn't show much anxiety over killing Duncan.
Machiavelli works to achieve his primary purpose to convince readers that a prince must ruin a conquered republic or live there by:
1. Explaining the roots of rebellion in conquered republics.
The best way to secure a state that has been formerly free is by complete destruction. If the prince does not make this decision, he will be in danger of being destroyed himself. No matter if the state was acquired long ago, rebellions, encouraged by the ideals of freedom and tradition, will always rise.
2. Contrasting the characteristics of principalities and republics.
Machiavelli explains that cities or provinces used to being governed by a prince are easier to conquer after the family has been taken down. Citizens of these states have always obeyed a ruler and never met a free way of life. Thus, it is less problematic for the new prince to mantain the power in such places.
On the other hand, in republics, a sense of hatred and vengeance against the new prince will persist, so, to avoid rebellions, the best choice would be to destroy the republic or to personally occupy the conquered state.
