1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lesantik [10]
1 year ago
9

Freedom of equality is a fundamental right upheld by the US Constitution, yet society has attempted to place some restrictions t

o this right. Should there be a limitation on equality? Why/Why not?
PLS ANSWER
History
1 answer:
koban [17]1 year ago
4 0

The freedom of expression may be restricted under Article 19(3) if it can be shown that doing so is necessary to uphold "respect for the rights and reputations of others."

<h3>Why is equality freedom important?</h3>

Equal legal protections for all citizens and the absence of discrimination are prerequisites for democracy. The same kind of abuses are likely to be inflicted on other groups of people if the rights and freedoms of one part of the community are abused with impunity.

<h3>Why is it vital to have restrictions on free speech?</h3>

Regardless of the viewpoint, the restrictions on the right to free expression are dependent on place, time, and manner. These limitations serve to balance out other rights. For instance, schools may forbid speech that gravely impairs the learning environment or violates the rights of others.

<h3>What restrictions may there be on the right to free speech?</h3>

In order to maintain public safety, territorial integrity (the state's boundaries), or national security, public authorities may limit this freedom if they can demonstrate that their action is justifiable, required, and reasonable. avert chaos and criminal activity. the defense of morals or health.

There are times when restrictions are necessary to safeguard humankind's interests, values, and national security.

Learn more about freedom of expression: brainly.com/question/397185

#SPJ13

You might be interested in
15. How did the US respond to Villa's actions?
navik [9.2K]

The US respond to Villa's actions by The Pershing expedition

<u>Explanation:</u>

Since 1910 the Mexican revolution was causing utter destruction. In 1916, a leader named “Pancho” Villa crossed the Mexico border entered U.S and burnt down the Columbus town. It was actually an act of revenge that he wanted to take as Venustiano Carranza was declared as President of Mexico surpassing him.

Villa raided and took materials of war as he was desperate to take over the ammunition's and create a stir among the American government. This raid of Columbus definitely drew the attraction of the U.S. to wage a war against Mexico. The U.S responded by sending troops led by General Pershing in search of Villa which was unsuccessful.

8 0
3 years ago
The second bullet struck the Archduke close to the heart. He uttered only one word, “Sofia” —a call to his stricken wife. Then h
Sidana [21]
The correct option is C

<span>C. Serbian nationalism
</span>
The heir to the Austria-Hungary throne  and his wife Sophie were shot dead by a Serbian nationalist in Sarajevo,Bosnia. The assassination is believed by historian to be the immediate cause of ww1. The Austrian-Hungarian government saw this as a direct attack on their country and believed that the Serbian authorities had helped the Bosnian terrorists.
<span></span>
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What assumptions have been made about fingerprints? What are the problems with these assumptions?
Pavel [41]

Fingerprint matching is determined through unique characteristics. To achieve it must have certain ridges. loops and whorls. The characteristic points are then compared to the prints on the system. When forensics finds that there are enough similar matching points, they state whether they are fingerprints in which they match or not.

It is assumed that prints are one hundred percent positive, that is their use is one hundred percent successful with a zero error.

However, the prints are not considered scientific evidence, but it is still a presumption. There is never a hundred percent matching the prints, but just the similarity within the prints.

8 0
3 years ago
#34. The Concurrent powers are
lorasvet [3.4K]

Answer:

D.

Explanation:

" Concurrent powers are powers of a federal system of government shared by both the federal government and each constituent political unit (such as states or province) "

7 0
2 years ago
What do civil liberties have to do with a democratic society?
kodGreya [7K]

Civil liberties are protections against government actions.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How had the US been involved in Latin America long before WWII
    12·1 answer
  • What were the two parts of each colony’s government?
    12·2 answers
  • {12 Points!}
    9·2 answers
  • Which are examples of China's early civilization? Choose all answers that are correct.
    11·2 answers
  • Which element of modern democracy is most related to Greco-Roman principles?
    15·1 answer
  • the literary period from 1800 to 1860 reflects the democratic spirit by a. questioning the value of freedom through antigovernme
    5·1 answer
  • After industrialization began in Europe, ideas of race began to exhibit a complexity beyond white/non-white that grew out of all
    7·1 answer
  • Which nationalities vied for control of delaware?
    12·2 answers
  • ¿Qué cambios crees que se dieron en la vida de México desde el modelo exportador hasta los años sesenta?
    7·1 answer
  • In an effort to "modernize" Japan, Emperor Meiji did all of the following EXCEPT:
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!