Hey there!
Here is your answer:
<u><em>The proper answer is "2".</em></u>
Reason:
<u><em>2 is placed in the desert which is most likely to have a drought due to the lack of resources meaning water, and the lack of plantation therefore would have droughts.</em></u>
<em>Therefore it should be 2.</em>
If you need anymore help feel free to ask me!
Hope this helps!
~Nonportrit
Answer:
The Bible, also known as the Holy Bible, is a group of religious texts of Judaism and Christianity, it contains the both Old Testament and The New Testament. ... All the texts that make a book are believed to belong together. Most of the time, people believe they were written or collected by the same person.
Answer:
Overpopulation is just one hurdle. Overpopulated, developing countries face more food shortages, water scarcity and stunted economic growth by far than more developed nations. ... Uncontrolled fertility causes poverty, which causes hunger, scarcity and distress.
Question:
Why do you think Lincoln didn't end slavery in the north?
Answer:
The proclamation didn't end slavery because it didn't affect the border slave states that weren't in rebellion, and it had no immediate effect in most of the deep South because, at least on the day it was issued, the slaves were in territory still controlled by the Confederacy.
Explanation:
Abraham Lincoln did believe that slavery was morally wrong, but there was one big problem: It was sanctioned by the highest law in the land, the Constitution. The nation’s founding fathers, who also struggled with how to address slavery, did not explicitly write the word “slavery” in the Constitution, but they did include key clauses protecting the institution, including a fugitive slave clause and the three-fifths clause, which allowed Southern states to count enslaved people for the purposes of representation in the federal government.
In a three-hour speech in Peoria, Illinois, in the fall of 1854, Lincoln presented more clearly than ever his moral, legal and economic opposition to slavery—and then admitted he didn’t know exactly what should be done about it within the current political system.
Abolitionists, by contrast, knew exactly what should be done about it: Slavery should be immediately abolished, and freed enslaved people should be incorporated as equal members of society. They didn’t care about working within the existing political system, or under the Constitution, which they saw as unjustly protecting slavery and enslavers. Leading abolitionist William Lloyd Garrison called the Constitution “a covenant with death and an agreement with Hell,” and went so far as to burn a copy at a Massachusetts rally in 1854.
-Alan Becker
Answer:
Yes, Canada is a nation of both peacekeepers and peacemakers.
No, peacekeeping is not a myth.
Explanation:
Peacekeepers country often put itself in a position as mediators between other countries that interacted with one another. Canada has done this several times throughout history (one small example would be when Canada mediate a conflict of imports quota between United States and Mexico).
On top of that, Canada also involved in several peacemakers mission when they sent their resources to help the people who are trapped within political conflicts. (one example of this would be when Canada sent help to Cambodia during four peace support missions from 1954 to 2000.)
From those historical events alone, I believe Canada could be considered as a nation of both peacekeepers and peacemakers.
