No the freedom of a group of people should not cause the other set of people to have less freedom.
<h3>What is the declaration of independence?</h3>
This is the article that talked about the reason why the colonists wanted to be away from the leadership of the English people in the colonies. It talked about the issues that the people faced in the hands of Britain.
Freedom is supposed to be the universal right of all the people of the world but there are times that situations may exists that may cause some people to act like they are superior than other people.
For instance was during the colonial days, and the days that there was slavery in the United States.
The conclusion is that No the freedom of a group of people should not cause the other set of people to have less freedom.
Read more on the declaration of independence here:
brainly.com/question/9515546
#SPJ1
Answer:
B.
The tales showed a smaller trickster conquering more powerful figures, who represented enslavers
The correct answer is B) Native Americans could not trade effectively because they lacked economic leaders.
<em>The disadvantage that native Americans experienced in their trading with Europeans was that Native Americans could not trade effectively because they lacked economic leaders. </em>
European people had many years of experience trading with some other nations. For instance, with Asian and African territories when they expanded their dominions in those regions. So they had experience in negotiating good trades. That was not the case of Native American tribes that had a completely different system of trade with other Native American tribes. There were not experienced leaders in trading with European people and that represented a disadvantaged in negotiations.
