Answer:
A. promoting social justice
Explanation:
Discrimination in any manner is prohibited at all the public places, and work places are part of such places covered.
There cannot be any discrimination on the grounds of religion, color, gender, or by any other categorization.
In this manner, every individual is treated equally, irrespective of the background he or she belongs too.
This provides a social justice to every individual. In this manner the social status, personality is not hindered.
Answer:
Both will bear
Explanation:
Both Mr. Janey and Ms. lacey will bear the incidence of the property tax increase because Mr. Janey has only shifted $540 ( $45 x 12) of the total $1200 by increasing the monthly rent charge of his tenant Ms. lacey by $45/month. Mr. Janey will pay only $660 of $1200 increase in tax and remaining will be paid by Mr Lacey.
Answer:
18.52%
Explanation:
Calculation for the what would be the equity weight
Using this formula
Equity weight =E÷E+P+D
Let plug in the formula
Equity weight=$2,000,000×$27÷$2,000,000×$27+$1,000,000×$14.50+$10,000×.98×$1,000
Equity weight=$14,500,000÷$78,300,000
Equity weight=.1852×100
Equity weight=18.52%
Therefore what would be the equity weight is 18.52%
Answer:
Department Y $9000
Department Z $5000
Explanation:
Delivery expense can be calculated using the allocation and apportionment method for Y and Z.
<u>Step 1. Allocation</u>
The costs that are directly attributable to the departments would be allocated to its relevant department. Here, $1500 are the direct expenses for the deliveries for the department Y, so at the first step,
Department Y Cost = $1500
For the department Z, their are no direct expenses for the deliveries,so at the first step,
Department Z Cost = $0
<u>Step 1. Apportionment</u>
The indirect cost of $12500 ($14000 - $1500) would be apportioned among department Y and Z.
So
Department Y = $1500 + $12500 x 60% = $9000
Department Z = $12500 x 40% = $5000
Answer:
The correct answer is option a and c.
Explanation:
The fed cannot control the money supply up to a great extent in the real world. This is because the feds can control the amount of required reserves that a commercial bank holds. But they cannot control the amount of excess reserves that a bank decides to hold which affects the money supply.
At the same time, the feds cannot control the amount of money that the households decide to hold as currency which also affects the money supply.
The amount of excess reserves a bank decides to hold affects the deposit-reserve ratio. While the amount of money that households decide to hold affects the currency deposit ratio. Both of these ratios affect the money supply.
