Which of the following describes the female pelvis compared to that of the male?

1 answer:

8 0

Note tha the option that describes the female pelvis compared to that of the male is; " The distance between the female ischial spines is greater." (Option B)

<h3>What is the Pelvis and why is it important?</h3>

In human anatomy, the pelvis is a basin-shaped network of bones that links the trunk and the legs, supports and balances the body, and houses and supports the intestines, urine bladder, and internal sex organs.

The pelvic girdle, together with the sacrum and coccyx, creates the pelvis, a bowl-shaped area that covers internal reproductive organs, the urine bladder, and the bottom section of the digestive system.

Learn more about Pelvis:
brainly.com/question/9217183
#SPJ1

You might be interested in

True or false: Gender-typing is fueled by gender schemas. True false question.

LekaFEV [45]

It is True that Gender-typing is fueled by gender schemas.

<h3>What is Gender schema?</h3>

Gender schema theory serves as cognitive theory of gender development that stress that any gender serves as output of a particular culture.

Gender schema theory can be attributed to

psychologist Sandra Bem who gave an assertion about how children is able to continuously learn about male as well as female roles from the culture that they grow up with.

This theory stressed that children can easily adjust their behavior so as to be able to fit in with the gender norms as regards their culture even from lowest stages of social development.

The theory was put up by psychologist Sandra and he explains that people process information, in part.

Learn more about gender schemas at

brainly.com/question/7277651

#SPJ1

5 0

2 years ago

What is one reason students take SAT Subject Tests?

Veseljchak [2.6K]

C. We take subject tests to demonstrate our strengths to increase the chances of admission into a particular school in a university, such as the school of engineering.

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Comparing and contrasting characters or even texts is not usually a good way to discuss the meaning or value of a work.

Mnenie [13.5K]

The statement about whether comparing and contrasting characters is not usually a good way to find the value of a work is:

False

<h3>Literary Analysis</h3>

This refers to the overall appraisal of a piece of literary work and this can be done through comparisons and contrasts.

With this in mind, this is one of the ways of making literary analysis, as it helps the researcher to find the differences which exists and by this, find the value of the text.