1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Phoenix [80]
1 year ago
11

If a proposed amendment violates the Constitution, should the Supreme Court be able to block its ratification?

History
1 answer:
Goryan [66]1 year ago
5 0

Answer:

If a proposed amendment violates the constitution should the supreme court be able to block its ratification. No. The Supreme Court would be violating their constitutional separation of powers if they tried to block a new amendment to the Constitution.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
How would you define general powers?-American Government
Mariulka [41]

Answer:

吸它子

Explanation:

6 0
4 years ago
Spartan education focused mostly on...
JulijaS [17]

Answer:

d

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Which of the following statements best describes the effects of the civil war in Sudan?
lord [1]

The correct answer is D. Sudanese refugees fled to neighboring countries.

Sudanese refugees which fled to neighboring countries led to effects of civil war in Sudan.

The civil war in sudan originated in Southern Sudan where it spread to Blue Nile and Nuba Mountains.

This war was the one which was the longest in record. Six years after the war ended, its result was the independence of South Sudan. It is in this war that many people died, there was outbreak of diseases and famine, and many people were displaced.

Sudan was divided to southern and Northern provinces when it was governed by british.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
3. overall, what does the arch of constantine symbolize? why was it erected? what messages) does it communicate?
Softa [21]

The Arch of Constantine is more than just a triumphal monument. It is a symbolic union between Constantine and his past rulers  and a harbinger of a new religion. The Arch of Constantine is the greatest surviving Roman triumphal arch.

<h3>What is Constantine?</h3>
  • Constantine I, also known as Constantine the Great, was Roman emperor from  306 to 337 AD and was the first person to convert to Christianity.
  • Born in Nisos, Dacia in the Mediterranean, he was born the son of Constantine his Flavius, a Roman army officer of Illyrian origin, who was one of his four rulers of Tetrarchia.
  • Constantine made Christianity the main religion of Rome and founded Constantinople, which became the most powerful city in the world.
  • Emperor Constantine ruled during a major transitional period of the Roman Empire.
  • Constantine I was a Roman emperor who reigned in the early 4th century.
  • He was the first Christian emperor and saw the empire begin to become a Christian nation.
  • He played an important role in the spread of Christianity by legalizing the practice of Christianity and financially supporting church activities.
  • He made one of his greatest contributions to his faith by convening the councils of Arles and Nicaea.

To learn more about Constantine from the given link :

brainly.com/question/2656862

#SPJ4

6 0
1 year ago
Did the us ever join the coalition during the napoleonic wars
Savatey [412]
Basically US involvement in the Napoleonic War in alliance with France would end up with a similar situation to the War of 1812, especially when Napoleon invades Spain.

With the Royal Navy being Superior to the French and American Navies combined in the period of the Napoleonic war there would be little to no chance of French support reaching the Americans across the Atlantic and America would be too involved in fighting the British forces in North America to send that much aid to France...not to mention the fact that not every State in the Union wanted to fight Britain in the first place in the War of 1812 when it was a personal quarell between the two countries so I can't see them wanting to fight Britain just to help Napoleon.

With the Royal Navy able to depend on Horatio Nelson until Trafalgar (as that would probably happen regardless of the POD), Cuthbert Collingwood, Thomas Cochrane and William Sidney Smith (just to highlight some of calibre of the British naval commanders) it is unlikely that the tiny US Navy would be able to do anything against the British because in the War of 1812 they found it hard to even get out to sea so I find it hard to believe that they would be able to cross the Atlantic themselves.

In summary American involvement in the Napoleonic wars would just lead to two different fronts being created for the British, the Peninsular War and an American War, but I do not think that Britain would be unable to deal with that.
5 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Please help! 50 points if you answer!!
    8·1 answer
  • . A form of war emphasizing quick movements to take an enemy off guard
    7·1 answer
  • How did the missouri compromise satisfy the north and south?
    5·1 answer
  • Why do you need a republic
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following type of colonies was given permission by the British king to govern itself?
    5·1 answer
  • HELP PLEASE
    8·2 answers
  • Which is a false statement about the use of longitude and latitude lines on maps?
    7·2 answers
  • Was the Cold War a success for the Us?
    5·1 answer
  • An argument of president jefferson against the idea of judicial review was that:
    7·2 answers
  • Soldiers could march about 20 miles every day. What other qualities would someone need to be a good soldier?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!