The way that the factor will influence the discussion between the prosecutor and the witnesses:
Source amnesia - The witnesses will be unable to tell the prosecutor everything that he or she has seen as they must have forgotten it or has surpressed the memory.
Retroactive interference - Due to the picture of the crime scene, and every that has transpired, the witness will still be in shock and this may hinder him or her from recalling all that took place in the crime scene to the prosecutor
The misinformation effect - Due to the fact that the witnesses want to give a detail scenario of what happen to the prosecutor, he or she may add some information to what has happen so that the persecutor may understand his or her story.
<h3>What is the definition of the terms?</h3>
The inability to remember when, where, or how one gained information that has been kept is known as source amnesia.
Retroactive interference describes situations when new learning obstructs prior knowledge. Forgetting may result through interference, degradation, or failing to restore the context of initial learning.
Therefore, the phrase "misinformation effect" is used in the literature on cognitive psychology to refer to both experimental and real-world situations when inaccurate information is included into a description of a historical event.
Learn more about The misinformation effect from
brainly.com/question/15117552
#SPJ1
