According to the diagram, the correct labeling from the air layer closest to the earth’s surface to the one farthest from the earth’s surface would be from the warm air to cool air to cooler air.
<h3>What is an
air layers?</h3>
An air layers refers to the separate layers of air condensation on the earth surface.
The air layers ranges from very cold, very warm or very hot.
In conclusion, the correct labeling will be from the warm air to cool air to cooler air.
Read more about air layers
<em>brainly.com/question/24112134</em>
<em><u> Definition of child labor:</u></em>
<em><u>Child labor refers to practically any form of work or physical participation/activity that can deprive a child of his/her/their childhood. Such activities that are unwanted or unfavorable to both the physical and mental health of the child and/or children involved also affects their normal development as a human being.</u></em>
<u><em>Positives</em></u>
- In some countries, parents consider their children as a reliable source of income. It can be a huge support for poor families if their children bring in the money.
- Children from a poor family can pay their school fees by working during their free time.
- Some children in developing countries often help with their family business, which assists in the process of the products.
- Child Labor is cheap. If a family has sick family members, the child can work and bring in income.
<em> </em>
<u><em></em></u>
<em> </em><u><em>Negatives</em></u>
- Child labor often involved children working in hazardous and dangerous conditions.
- They start from a very young age which can strip them from their childhood.
- Children are working, so they have no access to education.
- The organizations that employ children to work sometimes abuse them illegally if they are not working up to expected standards.
Other people trying to conquer you instead. If you come across competitors who are crossing the same route, that could mean war for money, gold and an assortment of other things.
Answer:
The correct answer is: a. Public compliance; private acceptance.
Explanation:
Public compliance can be understood as the social phenomena that occur when a group of people superficially agree on a particular thing, usually to get social approval.
<u>Private acceptance can be understood as a more personal change in attitude that individuals experience when they are fundamentally convinced of something they may have not seen before, but do not express it loudly and socially. </u>
In this particular case, when the participants of the standard experiments were able to write their responses on a piece of paper, conformity dropped dramatically. This means that during the experiments the level of public compliace were high while the levels of private acceptance were low.
In conclusion, the correct answer is a. Public compliance; private acceptance.
<span>ART BY THOMAS POROSTOCKY</span>PRO: RESEARCH ON GENE EDITING IN HUMANS MUST CONTINUE
By John Harris
<span>John Harris is professor emeritus in science ethics at University of Manchester, U.K., and the author of How to be Good, Oxford University Press 2016.</span>
In February of this year, the Human Fertilization and Embryology Authority in the United Kingdom approved a request by the Francis Crick Institute in London to modify human embryos using the new gene editing technique CRISPR-Cas9. This is the second time human embryos have been employed in such research, and the first time their use has been sanctioned by a national regulatory authority. The scientists at the Institute hope to cast light on early embryo development—work which may eventually lead to safer and more successful fertility treatments.
The embryos, provided by patients undergoing in vitro fertilization, will not be allowed to develop beyond seven days. But in theory—and eventually in practice—CRISPR could be used to modify disease-causing genes in embryos brought to term, removing the faulty script from the genetic code of that person’s future descendants as well. Proponents of such “human germline editing” argue that it could potentially decrease, or even eliminate, the incidence of many serious genetic diseases, reducing human suffering worldwide. Opponents say that modifying human embryos is dangerous and unnatural, and does not take into account the consent of future generations.
