If someone believe that is never ethical to eat meat, they believe that right or wrong is defined by personal belief/prejudice
They didn't use god and religion as their right and wrong guidebook, and they also don't use concrete facts as for why is it wrong for human to eat animal unless "because they also have feelings" argument
I purchased (a couple years ago) a dippin dots maker for juice and things like that. It was terrible and the dippin dots did not come out right. ( I don’t remember what happened to it.)
Answer:
True
Explanation:
In the case of naked options, the seller does not own any stock which is underlying Also the payoff related call option shows the difference between the price of the stock and the strike price
Therefore in the given situation, since he decides to write and sell without purchasing the stock but the purchased could be done when the option is exercised
So by the above explanation, the given statement is true
Answer:
We will be able to purchase fewer goods and services.
Explanation:
Appreciation of a currency in terms of another currency implies an increase in the worth of a currency in terms of another currency.
An appreciation in the value of peso in terms of dollars means that the worth of peso has increased in terms of dollar.
In other words, the worth of dollar in terms of peso has decreased. The value of $1,000 will decline.
So, a tourist in Mexico with $1,000 will be able to buy fewer goods an services.
