Both were Americans who became famous in Europe before they were known in United States.
The best answer is
<span>The author uses indirect characterization to describe how Millicent feels.
While the author's description of the ceremony gives the idea that Millicent probably looks pretty gross, with egg on her head and whatnot, the passage mainly gives the reader an empathetic view into Millicent's experience.
The scene is described as sounds and sensations from Millicent's point of view. She feels her stiff hair, and the cold egg on her back, hears the stifled laughter and crunch of the egg breaking. We can imagine the intensity of the experience, blindfolded and hearing, feeling, and probably smelling the unpleasant experiences during this initiation.
In the end, the passage concludes with: "</span><span>It was all part of the ceremony." This final sentence may relay how Millicent is processing the unpleasant initiation, rationalizing that this is just a step on her way to being part of the group. </span>
The correct answers are:
1. Hand me THOSE papers - demonstrative.
2. They call THEMSELVES The Ambassadors. - reflexive.
3. Has ANYONE seen Tim? - indefinite.
4. WHAT did you say? - interrogative.
5. The cat THAT followed me home is a black angora. - relative.
6. WE won the game. - nominative.
7. The first team beat US. objective.
8.Tom, WHOSE turn it is, will speak. - possessive.
Paragraph 5 and 6 greatly contribute to the development of the ideas in <em>Josephine Baker's speech</em> by specifically <em>D. providing evidence that </em><em>racism</em><em> does not exist in all countries.</em>
- The two paragraphs helped to show that racism, as practiced in American then, did not exist in France, where the speaker ran to.
- In France, Baker was never addressed by any derogatory nicknames as blacks in America were.
Thus, the paragraph 5 - 6 connected and compared her days in America filled with racial discrimination and segregation with her free life in France.
Read more about Josephine Baker's Speech at brainly.com/question/9054295 and brainly.com/question/17940900
Ellie puts Coop on the stand the next day. This testimony turns intensely personal for a few moments before Ellie is able to get a handle on her emotions and direct Coop toward Katie and her treatments. Coop speaks about the dissociative state and how it relates to Katie's case. Coop suggests that the death of the infant from natural causes would be enough to cause Katie to block out the child's death. The prosecution questions Coop and tries to put holes in his case. Finding this to only be marginally successful, the prosecution asks Coop about his relationship with Ellie, suggesting their intimate relationship has something to do with his testimony.
Ellie calls Samuel next. Samuel speaks of Katie's character and the Amish way of life. When the prosecutor attempts to get Samuel to admit Katie is capable...
