Answer:
do u wanna work on this together? i havent done it yet but it could be faster if we split it up
Explanation:
Answer:
The correct answer is B. In Bush v. Gore, the Supreme Court decided that the Florida Supreme Court decision to hold a new recount was unconstitutional and Bush was the winner.
Explanation:
Bush v. Gore is the title of a controversial 2000 U.S. Supreme Court ruling that decided the winner of the 2000 US presidential election. The court ruled that the counting of votes proposed by the Florida Supreme Court was contrary to the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, and that no other counting method could be applied within the statutory deadline. Three judges held that the Florida Supreme Court, in its ruling, also violated Article II of the Constitution by misinterpreting Florida's election laws.
Al Gore, in fact, asked for a manual vote count in only 4 Florida counties, in which the Democratic Party has traditionally had more support, but did not seek a count in those districts that are more Republican-friendly.
Following this ruling, Florida's 25 electoral votes were awarded to George W. Bush, who thus gained 271 electoral votes, while Al Gore had 266 electoral votes.
Answer:
Explanation:
Earth’s climate is now changing faster than at any point in the history of modern civilization, primarily as a result of human activities. The impacts of global climate change are already being felt in the United States and are projected to intensify in the future.
I believe this is your answer. Again I think
Answer:
they wanted the United States to use silver to back the dollar at a value that would inflate the prices farmers received for their crops, easing their debt burden. This position was known as the Free Silver Movement.
Explanation:
