1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Lelu [443]
3 years ago
14

Jefferson wrote that “all men are created equal and endowed with certain unalienable rights”. Do you think he was including wome

n, slaves, Native Americans, and the poor in this quote? Why?
History
1 answer:
tigry1 [53]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

In writing that "all men are created equal and endowed with certain unalienable rights", Jefferson was not in any way including women, slaves, Native Americans, or the poor.

On the contrary, the concept of citizenship in the 1700s (and therefore, the rights granted by the Constitution) was limited only to free, white men of a certain social status, who were the only ones who participated in politics and who they could exercise their rights without limitation.

Women, on the other hand, were in the background in the society of the time, being mere companions of the man, on whom they depended for most of the decisions. The natives and the poor resembled these, but they lacked their social status and were considered to be the last range of society. Ultimately, slaves were considered mere merchandise, and not people.

Although the American Revolution had among its main ideologies the idea of ​​equality and freedom, the truth is that its full application took several decades of social maturation and the struggle for rights.

You might be interested in
When did the American Revolution end? How do you know that?<br><br> I give Brainliest!
garik1379 [7]

Answer:

1776 because that was the year America became free because of the Declaration of Independence

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Drawing Conclusions One of
liq [111]

Answer:

1789

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
What was the function of the United Nations? The act as a jury for world affairs. To deal with problems that might arise between
maks197457 [2]

Answer:

The leage of nations was the predecessor the UN. The UN basically wanted to promote piece in thw world, and mediate small scale conflicts between countries to prevent war

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In 1949, moruzzi and magoun severed a cat's _____________ from higher brain regions; the cat lapsed into a permanent coma.
uranmaximum [27]
In 1949, Moruzzi and Magoun severed a cat's reticular formation <span>from higher brain regions; the cat lapsed into a permanent coma.</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In the US some people believe controls necessary while others believe gun rights should not be restricted what is the effect of
tigry1 [53]

Answer:

I mean debate can encourage new laws but if you have one side wishing for laws and the other against it. It will usually slow legislation which is entirely the purpose. But it depends on what view are you taking it from because th end result can be no legislation at all or even a relaxation of legislation in fact that's happened in some states. So it depends on the view and narrative you wish to push. because it can be a semblance of all but B. If you're a centrist you'd probably say this debate will encourage new laws but the whole point of not wishing for infringements upon one's rights means no new laws. If you wanted new laws then this debate is a waste of time but you're angering a large portion of the population because you seek not to listen to the statistics and thereby information one may have that may dissuade from the legislation. And if you look at D it can be so. If 2 cannot agree then rights will not be infringed upon. Unless the side with more representatives that disagrees with the right then such laws will be enacted. Yes, they can place new restrictions and there you can make the case it's unconstitutional and etc because well there is ground and a foundation laid upon there. But as far as an actual thing it'd be A I suppose. But I'd question the teacher because it depends on how one views a division. It can be either cooperative relationships that can be mended or an all or nothing if it's not my way then we will have conflict and it shall erupt. It all depends.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Why were the mongols unable to retain power over conquered nations over time?
    12·1 answer
  • How do courts set precedent
    11·1 answer
  • What was the purpose of Henry Clay’s American System?
    9·2 answers
  • What is the name for the branch of the French Army created for foreign recruits?
    11·1 answer
  • How was the New Jersey colony more democratic in its process of governing than the other colonies
    11·1 answer
  • How do you think religion should<br><br> interact with politics in general?
    8·1 answer
  • How did the declaration of independence change lives?
    9·1 answer
  • This statement was made by Chief Joseph in 1877.
    9·2 answers
  • Social studies how did Texas become a state of the United States <br>​
    13·1 answer
  • During the Australian gold rush of the 1850s, gold was discovered in all of the following places except __________. A. South Aus
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!