The first one i think just double check
because it shows how you know this by saying he used quotes
Two events in Britain indirectly influenced the American revolution Passage of the English Bill of Rights and the English declaration of independence indirectly affected the American Revolution.
<h3>What is English Bill of Rights?</h3>
The English Bill of Rights formed a constitutional monarchy in England, meaning the king or queen acts as head of state but his or her powers are determined by law. Under this system, the monarchy couldn't rule without the support of Parliament, and the people were given personal rights.
<h3>What is the Declaration of Independence?</h3>
The Declaration of Independence, the founding document of the United States, was supported by the Continental Congress on July 4, 1776, and promoted the separation of 13 North American British territories from Great Britain.
To learn more about English Bill of Rights, refer
brainly.com/question/10498671
#SPJ9
Give all raw materials to there country. Let them make finished or manufacturing goods, them sell them back to the colonies.
Answer: A is correct, B is correct, C is correct, E is correct
Explanation: the British invested more in trade than in a possession of land, British colon were much more numerous, the French were concentrated on farming, production of wine etc., the British dominated in the North America.
Answer:
The electoral college system was the best solution they chose to democratically elect a president in a way that was both consistent with republican values and with the protections of rights of smaller states.
Explanation:
The Constitution and the new laws in the United States were revolutionary and pioneering by the end of the 18th century. The Founding Fathers could not look at a previous democratic model to find inspiration, because autocracy was the system of government anywhere else. One of the great dilemmas of democracy is how to avoid the tyranny of majorities over minorities. Could they have thought of a better system then? Maybe it was possible in theory, but it was very hard in practice. Besides, the population of the fomer colonies wasn´t as large as it´s today, and there were only 13 states, not 50. They could hardly have envision some outcomes we´ve seen in recent years when some candidates have won the popular vote, but have failed to win key states and electoral votes. They chose what they saw as the best option.
