1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
sattari [20]
3 years ago
5

What did thomas jefferson argue that the people should do if the government disregards the will of people?

History
1 answer:
algol [13]3 years ago
5 0
He argued that if the government were ever to disregard the people to revolt against our own government.
You might be interested in
Why might demographers compare a dot density map to an economic opportunity map? Check all that apply.
Solnce55 [7]

1 is wrong - climate has nothing to do with those maps.

2 is right.

3 is wrong as geography is not shown on those maps.

4 is right too.

5 yes.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What are the two ways to read the constitution?
Levart [38]

Answer:

Strict or Loose Interpretation

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
Help me pleaseeeeeee
AlekseyPX
C due to the fact that they needed to do that

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What are the requirements to vote in Arizona? Check all that apply.
pogonyaev
Voter registration. To vote in Arizona, one must be a citizen of the United States and a resident of an Arizona county. A voter must be 18 years or older on or before Election Day. To be eligible to vote in an election one must register at least 29 days prior to the election.
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Do you consider Bishop Eusebius’s account to be reliable? Why or why not?
Tcecarenko [31]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Do you consider Bishop Eusebius’s account to be reliable?

No, really not.

The reason why because his account had created many controversies.

Eusebius has been known as the official historian of the church. He participated in the Council of Nice in 314, organized by Roman Emperor Constantine to revise the religious or historic documents that would end up being in the Bible.

So Eusebius based most of his comments on personal opinions and other historic document's interpretations. It is difficult to say that he did the proper research and had reliable sources. During the Nicea Council, a group of Bishops decided what documents had to be part of the Bible and which not, based on their own criteria. That is not a good indicator of the validity of the documents included, even less we can consider those as sacred.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which best describes Andrew Jackson’s opinion on the National Bank?
    5·1 answer
  • The ancient egyptian civilization was the first to publish books describing advances in the field of
    12·1 answer
  • How did Winston Churchill’s “Iron Curtain” speech impact the Truman Doctrine?
    15·2 answers
  • True or false. Were pyramids built by slaves
    9·2 answers
  • 50:2
    8·1 answer
  • What is censorship and how do dictators use it?
    11·1 answer
  • Which of these was more likely to happen during the postclassical era than during the classical period?
    13·2 answers
  • What was one challenge that resulted from the collapse of the Soviet Union?
    5·1 answer
  • In the fourth and fifth centuries, the Roman Empire was under pressure as a result of which external event?
    8·1 answer
  • "Joyce reached inside the pillowcase and revealed the fluffy fugitive." What form of figurative language is being used by the au
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!