Answer:
2) “Separate but unequal” schools are unconstitutional.
Explanation:
This is a statement from the outcome of the historical <em>Brown v. Board of Education</em> lawsuit, which basically stated that "separate but equal" schools and facilities are unconstitutional.
From the passage, we can extract the words "the doctrine of 'separate but equal' has no place...Therefore, we hold that the plaintiffs . . . are . . . deprived of the equal protection of the laws guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment".
Essentially, this is saying that "separate but equal" is not actually equal, which means that the people (Brown) who sued the education district (Board of Education) were not awarded their full rights granted by the 14th Amendment - and that is unconstitutional.
Answer: The imperialists considered individual nations incapable of developing on their own. They emphasized that Catholicism would raise peoples to a more civilizational level, and eliminate primitive religious beliefs.
Explanation:
Some historians characterize imperialism as one of the most brutal episodes in the history of the human race. The imperialists, on the other hand, sought to defend their actions by expressing several views. They rightly pointed out that individual societies are not capable of developing their economy on their own, and that they are not produced in this respect. They felt that their activities could improve the economic situation in non-developed countries. Considering that many countries that were victims of imperialism were underdeveloped, the imperialists emphasized that by adopting new technologies, they would improve the productivity of that society. When the Spaniards came to American territory, rumours began to emerge of cannibalism being prevalent among particular nations. They then sent Catholic missionaries outraging the process by intending to raise the awareness of these nations to a higher level. They also emphasized that the beliefs of these peoples were primitive and that Catholicism would influence these peoples to reach a higher civilization level.
Answer:
The House and Senate try to work out differences in a conference committee.
Explanation:
A comference comittee is a temporary ad-hoc, specially made panel, formed by House and Senate to discuss and come to an agreement on differences on a bill that varies from the one that has been passed in both House and Senate but is diverse from one another. They are usually formed to discuss several difficult and major controversial differences, for example this year there has been problems with the Tax Bill, where the senate passed one version of it, and the House passed another, so they now have to discuss and find a way to pass the same law.
The Protestant Reformation took place in the 16th century and was led mainly by Martin Luther. According to Luther, the Jews represented another challenge to Christian teachings, so he thought it was right to persecute Jews, as well as to set fire to their synagogues, to prohibit rabbis to teach about Judaism, to destroy Jews' homes, to sanction them economically and even to force them to do forced labor.
Answer:
The correct answer is D. It is not correct to try to convince the other person to agree with you when having a meaningful political conversation.
Explanation:
When talking about political issues, they often deal with controversial issues that can turn friendly talk into heated discussion. Therefore, as a way to prevent this, there are certain guidelines that must be taken into account.
Thus, not shouting, speaking personally and contemplating the opinion of the other party are fundamental criteria when it comes to having a serious and friendly political debate. In this way, cordiality regulates the content of the talk, and the acceptance of the thought different from the other (without the need to share it) gives legitimacy to the idea of the other person.
On the other hand, if in the conversation one of the parties tries to convince the other of its ideology, the conversation will most likely fail. This is so because when trying to convince, the other person's belief or conviction is discredited, a question that many people can take as a personal insult. Therefore, it is totally inadvisable to carry out this type of actions.
