There’s answers already on another post if you look it up
Romans came from the Italian pensinsula and came to Britain in the early first century. It was a gradual process and they slowly started conquering the different parts of the British isles during that time.
Vikings came from the Northern parts of Europe and they started conquering the British isles in later periods.
Both came and wanted to conquer the lands, while Romans were 'established' conquerors and started governing these areas soon by spreading their culture etc. The Vikings on the other hand had pillaing more in mind and did more of that and did not govern that much from the beginning.
Answer:
Realmente no entiendo la pregunta pero ...
Hubo muchas razones a largo y corto plazo para explicar por qué Estados Unidos se involucró en Vietnam a fines de la década de 1950.
..
1 razón: independencia vietnamita
2da razón- Guerra civil
Tercera razón: la teoría del dominó
Cuarta razón: el débil gobierno de Vietnam del Sur
Quinta razón: el incidente del golfo de Tonkin de 1964
Answer:
The theme is the risk-return relationship. generally, the higher the potential return of an investment, the higher the risk. there is no guarantee that you will actually get a higher return by accepting more risk. diversification enables you to reduce the risk of your portfolio without sacrificing potential returns.
Explanation:
Have a good day!!
Answer:
Britain also needed money to pay for its war debts. The King and Parliament believed they had the right to tax the colonies. They decided to require several kinds of taxes from the colonists to help pay for the French and Indian War. ... They protested, saying that these taxes violated their rights as British citizens.
Explanation:
here you go
