Answer:
Not A
Not B
Not C
Definitely D for the reason that they weren't given all their freedoms that the citizens had. A lot of people opposed immigrants and minorities back then, some still do and it's saddening.
"Women who enjoy a higher social status are usually less educated than women of a lower social status", the given statement best explains the connection between the social status of women and a country's overall health.
Answer: Option A
<u>Explanation:</u>
This statement best explains the relation between the social status of women and a country’s overall health because it explains the psychology of social class in any country. Here such difference is observed because the growth and development of people is immensely dependent on the environment they survived.
Hunger of Education is may also depend on discomfort one faced, which predicts the deficiency carried by any community or society in any nation but not all face struggles, some may get opportunities because their ancestors worked hard.
So, if women who enjoy higher social status and vision for the development of individuality then maybe they resulted from less education than the women with lower social status who target development for society and nation. However, here statement allows only for discussion of a probability rather than a surety.
Answer:
The Eastern Woodland Native Americans were named so because they were forest dwellers. The culture, political systems and daily life of the Eastern Woodlands were affected by the geography of where they lived. Waterways, flora, and fauna were plentiful.
Explanation:
Thi question is incomplete. Here´s the complete question.
The 2013 case of Windsor v. United States in the Second Circuit Court of Appeals employed ___ in holding that the Defense of Marriage Act held no legitimate state interest and thus overturned it.
Answer: intermediate scrutiny
Explanation:
In United States v. Windsor, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals confirmed the lower court's decision that Section 3 of DOMA was unconstitutional.
The court found that, since homosexuals had been historically subjected to discrimination, they could be considered as a group that falls under a "quasi-suspect classification", and therefore intermediate scrutiny could be applied.
DOMA was deemed unconstitutional under the equal protection guarantees of the Fifth Amendment because it didn´t pass that test.
