Gezon and Kottak argue that the relatively high incidence of expanded family households among poorer North Americans is
"an adaptation to poverty".
A significantly more typical response from researchers, in any case, was to recommend that discussing the way of life of the underclass was commensurate to "faulting the victim." Bad conduct and poor decisions, in this view, were a justifiable adaptation to poverty and the absence of chance in individuals' lives. In spite of the fact that my examination on the underclass was given a neighborly gathering, the greater part of the scholarly network has mixed around the view that awful practices are a result, as opposed to a reason, of poverty.
The correct answer should be theory of differential association.
According to this theory proposed by Edwin Sutherland, we tend to learn and adopt criminal behaviors by being around people who behave that particular way. So, in this case, Janet didn't use to smoke or drink, but when surrounded by people who did that, she adopted such behaviors over time.
The speaker of the house, the senate majority leader
Answer: since the other person was no help, it is true.
