Answer:
The answer would be the first one, After I get home, I will bathe the dog.
Explanation:
I hope this helps, if it doesn't then just message me and ill be more than happy to help :)
Answer:
Explanation:
1. I will first Identify the claim. The claim is sometimes stated in a very general way, then elaborated on throughout the essay.
2. I will next examine the claim for qualifiers; words like "some," "many," "most of the time," etc. It can sometimes be damaging to an argument to omit qualifiers, particularly if there are also no exceptions provided. It is up to you as a reader to determine whether the writer's unqualified claim is damaging to this particular argument.
3. I will then examine the claim for an exception. After looking for qualifying words in the claim, the next step is to determine what the writer considers to be the situations in which the writer's claim doesn't apply. In other words, it is necessary to identify any exceptions the writer makes to her claim.
Answer:The direct organization strategy presents the purpose of the document in the first paragraph (sometimes the first sentence) and provides supporting details in the body. The indirect organization strategy opens with relevant, attention-getting details that do not directly state the purpose of the document.
Explanation:
Answer:
B). Then the rebels will overcome the empire’s troops and take the city.
Explanation:
The sentence that would be the best addition to conclude the paragraph is displayed in option B and i.e. 'Then the rebels will overcome the empire’s troops and take the city' as it appropriately corresponds to the last sentence of the given paragraph that is written in simple future. This is the most perfectly offers an end to the paragraph, both grammatically and comprehensively. Thus, <u>option B</u> is the correct answer as the other options are grammatically incorrect. Option A wrongly employs overcame with take that doesn't offer parallelism and at the same not corresponding to the sentence prior to it. Option C and D also carries the similar error of not continuing the time of the previous sentence.
