1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Angelina_Jolie [31]
3 years ago
8

Indigenous peoples in the Americas had never eaten pork or beef before contact with European explorers. Which of the following a

ccurately explains why they had not done so?
A. Cattle and pigs were considered unclean.
B. Cattle and pigs were found only in Europe
C. Cattle and pigs were too expensive to raise
D. Cattle and pigs were considered sacred
History
1 answer:
Afina-wow [57]3 years ago
3 0
<span>The question is asking us why Indigenous peoples in the Americas had never eaten pork or beef before contact with European explorers. The answer is that B. Cattle and pigs were found only in Europe - before, Americans ate big rodents for example, which were found on this continents, but pigs and cows were not originally living in America, so they could only be kept after they were brought from Europe.</span>
You might be interested in
Which virtuoso pianist determined to become as famous as Paganini and became a Romantic era "pop star?"
quester [9]
I believe it was franz liszt
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
who wrote a brief account of the destruction of the indies to publicize spanish mistreatment of the indians?
Nataly_w [17]
Bartolomé de las Casas wrote it in 1552.
8 0
2 years ago
Please select all the apply​
solmaris [256]

Answer:

first ,third and the last one

5 0
2 years ago
Radical Republicans:
Komok [63]

Answer:

d. fully embraced the expanded powers of the federal government born during the Civil War.

Explanation:

Radical republican refers to a faction of the republican party members who were extreme in their policies during the American Civil War. This group largely contained politicians from northern free states. They championed the rights of Blacks, took staunch stand-towards prohibition of slavery, and enfranchisement of the blacks citizens. They blame the South for the war and destruction it brought. The group was dissolved by 1870's, accomplishing almost all their goals.

4 0
3 years ago
What happened with respect to the cold war with respect to 1987 the year?
siniylev [52]
<span>The key to your question is the fact that you asked if the U.S. government had "no involvement" in the 9-11 tragedy. Most people seem to jump to the polar opposite sides in this debate. Either you believe the government planned and committed the assault, or you think that everyone of that opinion is a crackpot and believe the government's explanations about what happened that day. I think the answer is somewhere in between. I find it difficult to believe that the U.S. government would plan an attack of that magnitude on its own people because there's far too much to lose. There's no doubt that there'd be a full-scale revolution by the people if the government was proven to be the masterminds of the event. In fact, you probably wouldn't even have to prove it beyond a shadow of a doubt. If enough evidence came out to make it look very likely, there'd be a very serious problem in the U.S.. Having said that, there are too many questions that have not been answered by the government - or the answers that they've provided are very weak and unbelievable. What makes matters worse is that the government has been attacking those who ask questions, linking all doubters to terrorist sympathizers. That kind of attack on free speech is dangerous and should never be trusted. I've always had a funny feeling that the 9-11 attacks are a combination of terrorist hatred for the U.S. and corruption by the Bush administration. I think that the terrorists hijacked planes and intended to hit the World Trade Center. I also believe that the government knew that the attack was coming, but did nothing about it. The attack gave the U.S. an excuse to expand its military and political activities in the middle east.</span>
6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What balance does winthrop propose for the relationship between the individuals and the community?
    13·2 answers
  • Taken literally what did the term lay investiture mean to medieval christans in the 11th century
    5·1 answer
  • How did the religious events in england affect the colonization efforts in the new world?
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following would NOT have improved civil rights and race relations at the turn of the century?
    10·2 answers
  • The French and Indians, the Number of each not known, had, as we found after, possessed the Sides and Brow of a Hill, in a circu
    11·2 answers
  • Which system of government is most likely to give you the greatest amount of personal freedoms?
    7·1 answer
  • What does the wounded knee massacre tell us about the attitude of white Americans toward American Indians during the 19th centur
    6·1 answer
  • Write an account of how land lost by Germany in 1919 caused anger among Germans. 8 marks
    14·1 answer
  • Imagine Patience and Hannah were living today in America. How different would their lives be? Would life be better or worse for
    8·1 answer
  • What problems did returning african american soldiers face after World War 1? a p e x
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!