Hey there! I'm happy to help!
The legislative branch is the principal law making body of the United States. A local version of this branch is like a city council. The judicial branch is the principal court of the United States, so a local version of that would be something like a city or county court. They are both part of two different systems. The legislative branch will be making regulations and laws while the judicial branch will be seeing if laws are constitutional and if what someone is doing is justified under the law. These are very different things, but they are tied together by the Constitution of the United States. The legislative branch creates laws that are constitutional to the best of their ability and the judicial branch interprets these laws and applies them to current cases.
Have a wonderful day! Keep on learning :D
Based on the excerpt and the speech in it, we can infer that the American imperialists<u> saw the </u><u>Philippines </u><u>as a </u><u>useful base</u><u> for </u><u>increasing American trade</u><u> with </u><u>East Asia.</u>
The views of the American imperialists were that:
- The Philippines were owned by the United States
- The Philippines were to be used as a base to penetrate China and its markets
The American imperialists believed that the Philippines were theirs and that they had the right to use it as they pleased including as a means to reach the valuable markets of China and the rest of East Asia.
In conclusion, the imperialists viewed the Philippines as a gateway to the East.
<em>Find out more at brainly.com/question/16384818. </em>
Answer:
why is there only one option? you need to have more so people can answer your question fully
Explanation:
Answer:
future is correct good job
We perceive that a great breach has been made in the moral and physical systems by the introduction of moral and physical evil; how or why, we know not; so, however, it is, and it certainly seems proper that this breach should be closed and order restored.
That men should pray and fight for their own freedom, and yet keep others in slavery, is certainly acting a very inconsistent, as well as unjust and, perhaps, impious part.
It is much to be wished that slavery may be abolished. The honour of the States, as well as justice and humanity, in my opinion, loudly call upon them to emancipate these unhappy people. To contend for our own liberty, and to deny that blessing to others, involves an inconsistency not to be excused.
