Basically, the decision of the supreme court was not respected by other authorities, specially by the president Andrew Jackson, who felt that on the one hand Georgia does not have to respect this ruling and on the other that the supreme court in any case cannot ensure the enforcement of it.
Specifically, the ruling of the court was that only the national government had the power to decide over Indian affairs, and since that power laid in Jackson's hands, he could allow Georgia to proceed with the removal of Cherokee by stating that he ( in the name of the national government) will not intervene. Instead, Jackson's actions were further adding to the removal of the Cherokee.
The could ve stronger to fight back
The Law of Comparative Advantage suggests that they can increase their total output of these two goods if jimmy focuses his production on footballs while James focuses his production on athletic shoes.
<h3>
What is Law of Comparative Advantage?</h3>
Comparative advantage can be described as the economy's ability that a comp[any posses in produce a particular good or service at a lower opportunity cost compare to her trading partners.
Therefore, Law of Comparative Advantage suggests that they can increase their total output of these two goods if jimmy focuses his production on footballs while James focuses his production on athletic shoes.
Learn more about Law of Comparative Advantage at:
brainly.com/question/12291750
#SPJ1
Answer:desserts
Explanation:Vast deserts border the Nile to the east and west.
