Answer:
Inductive, weak
Explanation:
An inductive reasoning is the opposite of deductive reasoning. Inductive reasoning applies knowledge of past experiences and observations to form conclusions. The premise and conclusion goes "if this happened now... this must then happen". This type of reasoning moves from specific to general as opposed to deductive reasoning that moves from general to specific.
The argument in our question is also a fallacy. A fallacy is a faulty logic or weak argument. The argument is a fallacy of faulty generalization, the typical "jumping into conclusion".
Pride and Prejudice is very romantic. What most wealthy single men lacked was a wife.
Answer: <em> An individual takes a civics course in school and develops opinions about politics.</em>
Explanation:
Political socialization is referred to as or known as the method through which an individual learn and thus frequently tends to internalize the political lens thereby framing their own perceptions and notions of how the power is utilized and thus how the world around it is organized, these perceptions moreover shape and also define the individuals perception of economic and political institutions.
