Answer:
Visual arts
Explanation:
I do not have an explanation but i just learned about this and did a quiz and got a 100 and this was also the second question on the quiz.
Answer:
Explanation:
I don't see how this is possible, but the answer seems to be A which is the only answer that makes sense.
Large tax cuts don't have anything to do with supply of goods. It does help consumption but that is not the same thing as supply side economics.
C is much truer for the aftermath of WWI than a general statement about Supply. I don't think it is the right answer.
It didn't call for increased government spending unless the government wanted the goods being produced.
I think I'd go with A. It is the most straight forward.
Yes, the federal government responded to the great recession of 2007-09.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
The United States endured the most serious post-war depression between December 2007 and June 2009.
The economic crisis of 2007-09 was long enough to call itself the "Great Recession" and accompanied by a lengthy and exceptionally slow recovery. The financial crisis was deep and severe enough.
The subsequent recessions have been followed by two types of policy mechanisms: monetary and fiscal.
Monetary policy is used to preserve low-interest rates and reduce unemployment both during and after depression, which is the Act regarding the Federal Reserve
.
In general, women worked as much as men during this time, although in different capacities. The working class people had to employ all members of a household in order to make ends meet.
Answer:
This body had a very different purpose from the first. Rather than just trying to demonstrate unity, this Congress was actually designed as a form of government to organize and direct the colonies.
Explanation:
