Answer:
The answer is colonialism Hope this helps!!
Explanation:
Arguments in favour of a minimum wage mostly hang on the idea that firms have a responsibility to ensure that their workers earn enough to live on. If a firm can’t pay its workers enough to live on, then it isn’t a viable business, because it is dependent on wage subsidies. Of course “enough to live on” depends where you live: the cost of living in London is considerably higher than it is in, say, Newcastle, so a minimum wage that would give a reasonable standard of living in Newcastle is starvation level in London. The campaign for a voluntary Living Wage tries to persuade firms to pay above the current UK minimum wage, which is perceived as being below the real cost of living.
Answer:
Match the answers:
Explanation:
Northern Securities Co. v. United States (1904): The case upheld breaking up the monopoly controlling railroad lines from Chicago to the Pacific Northwest
Lochner v. New York (1905): The case found that state limitations on workers hours violated their ‘freedom to contract’
The U.S.s stepped up efforts to prevent the expansion of
communism in the world. Apart from that
they continue to maintain bases in South Korea in case the North would once
again launch an attack. The Korean war
also saw the integration of African Americans into the army, meaning there were
no segregated troops during this war.
