The Great Awakening's best description is <em>a time of revival of Christianity in America</em>.
- The Great Awakening provided charismatic Christian preachers the opportunity to challenge irreligious secularism that was rearing its ugly head as a result of the Age of Enlightenment or Reason from Europe.
- This Christian revival restored Americans to their Christian upbringing and stopped the dominance of secularism, which encouraged reliance on scientific and logical thought processes.
Thus, the Great Awakening in the 1730's was necessary to restore Christianity to the front burner of American culture.
Read more about the Great Awakening at brainly.com/question/24585675
According to one major language theory, how did different groups develop their own languages?
Answer: There are two main theories that explain how different groups developed their own languages. The major one is that humans at some point in time evolved a language acquisition device.
I hope it helps, Regards.
Answer:
The rhetoric technique that Martin Luther King uses repeatedly in the above text is the use of similes and the use of figurative language.
Explanation:
Similes are speech techniques that use the comparison of two variables interestingly.
Figurative language is the use of a word to mean differently to its custom meaning.
<em>Martin Luther King uses Socrates and Jesus figuratively to explain his ideas, since, they are not part of his topic, but have similar traits as the situation he is trying to explain, this is an example of figurative language in the above excerpt.</em>
Martin Luther in this excerpt uses similes multiple times to bring out his points.
Some of the instances where he uses similes are;
- Isn't this like condemning Socrates because his unswerving commitment to truth and his philosophical inquiries
- Isn't this like condemning Jesus because his unique God consciousness and never ceasing devotion to God's will precipitated the evil act of crucifixion?
This questions help him explain his point, it also makes the people understand his point out of the comparison of what they know to what they do not know.
The Mongols could use either a massive army for battles or use smaller groups for ambushes (like guerilla warfare) as the need arose. Also, the Mongols were very well trained in the use of horses and bows. Also, from childhood the Mongols were taught to shoot and ride.
