Answer:
a. purchases of capital goods, all new residental constructionand inventory investment
Explanation:
It is the investment measure used for determining the GDP. It is an important part of GDP as it is used as an indicator for the productive capacity i.e. future. It involves the purchase i.e. replacement, net addition made to the capital assets, and the investment made in inventories
So according to this, the option a is considered as it involved all three thins that are shown above
Answer:
d) $100,000
Explanation:
In answer to this question, Tricia must include $100000 as the amount of the discharge of indebtedness from the disposition of her principal residence when when she is completing her Schedule CA for the year 2019.
We have option d, 100000 dollars as the answer because the amount of debt forgiven is known to be taxable.
The answer to this problem is "CHAMPION" such as when the <span> Senior Executive of the company who promotes the project and ensures its support, both financially and administratively aspects, at the highest or the top levels of the organization is needed to fill the role of a CHAMPION on a development team where he will leads and facilitate to achieve the common goals of the entire organization.</span>
Answer:
The answer is: Both parties could win, depending if there were other conditions established for the auction.
Explanation:
Usually when an auction is carried out there are conditions established beforehand by the auctioneer that must be fulfilled in order for the sale to be completed.
In this case, since we don´t know what other conditions the town of Sanford included in the auction, if any other condition at all, we can´t conclude which party could win the lawsuit. For instance if a reserve was required but Arthur and Arlene didn´t do the reserve deposit, then they will obviously lose. The same happens with other established conditions like a minimum price set, etc. But if no other condition established, then Arthur and Arlene could win.
Considering the situation described above, when Global Petroleum negotiated a deal with Saudi Arabia, this is an example of <u>Bartering</u>.
<h3>What is a Bartering?</h3>
Bartering is a transaction agreement whereby both parties agree to pay with goods or services without using money.
Therefore, in this situation, when Global Petroleum negotiated with Saudi Arabia to receive oil as partial payment over 20 years. This is an example of <u>Bartering</u>.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is <u>Bartering</u>.
Learn more about <u>Bartering</u> here: brainly.com/question/1462751