<span>False.
Experimental probability is based on doing trials.</span>
9514 1404 393
Answer:
h ≤ 6 2/3
Step-by-step explanation:
The inequality is presumed to be ...
15h +40 ≤ 140
15h ≤ 100
h ≤ 6 2/3
__
The graph shows h ≥ 0, because the inequality is only reasonable for h ≥ 0.
Step-by-step explanation:
Derive an expression for the equivalent width in a saturated line. Assume a Voigt profile, with the difference in optical depth between the center of the line and the wings being ~104. The wings of the line can be ignored. Define a frequency x1 = (v1 − v0)/ΔvD, where the optical depth τv = 1. Inside of x1 the line is fully saturated, and outside x1 the line is optically thin. Show that the equivalent width is

Note that the equivalent width is practically insensitive to the number density of absorbing material.
Since 3=30/10, (30+1)/10=31/10. 31s/10=(30+1)/5 ( we get 30 because 5*6=30) = 31/5. Multiplying both sides by 10, we get 31s=62 (since 5 is a factor of 10, we can do 10/5 =2 and multiply 2 by 31). Dividing both sides by 31, we get s =2
Answer:
h = 140
Step-by-step explanation:
To solve for h, we will have to get the equation into the form h = _. That would be our answer.
0.8h = 112
Divide 0.8 from both sides to get rid of the coefficient of 0.8 on the left side.
h = 112/0.8
Change 112/0.8 to 1120/8 on the right side. This will make the fraction easier to simplify.
h = 1120/8
Simplify the fraction on the right side.
h = 140/1
140/2 equals 140.
h = 140
I hope you find this helpful. :)
