Creating a connection between world or countries ✨
Answer: A. a disagreement between the states over representation in Congress.
The main disagreement was over whether representation would be the same for all states, or based on a state's population size. Then there was also a question, for basing representation on population size, about whether slaves counted in a state's population or not.
The Great Compromise and the Three-Fifths Compromise were worked out during the United States Constitutional Convention in 1787 in order to resolve these issues.
- The Great Compromise resolved a dispute between small population states and large population states. Initially, a unicameral (one-chamber) legislature was envisioned. The large population states wanted representation in Congress to be based on a state's population size. The smaller states feared this would lead to unchecked dominance by the big states; they wanted all states to receive the same amount of representation. The Great Compromise created a bicameral (two-chamber) legislature. Representation in the House of Representatives would be based on population. In the Senate, all states would have the same amount of representation, by two Senators.
- The Three-Fifths Compromise was a way of accounting (somewhat) for the population of slaves in states that permitted slavery. For taxation and representation purposes, the question was whether slaves should count in the population figures. (They were not considered voting citizens at that time.) The Three-Fifths Compromise said that three out of every five slaves could be counted when determining a state's population size for determining how many seats that state would receive in the House of Representatives.
Modern era was is the term that historians use to describe the historical period between the beginning of the 16th century and the 21st century.
Answer:
1) Peace
2) Do you believe sustained world peace is possible? Why or why not?
Explanation:
There are two valid definitions of the word peace:
<em>Peace is a period in time without any conflicts similar to war. </em>
<em>Peace is the state of freedom that no one disturbs.</em>
<em />
World peace is possible in <u>theory</u>.
To achieve world peace all of the nations would have to relinquish dogma, religion and political beliefs.
Those are the three main reasons why people cannot have peace.
Similar topics are discussed in many Utopian books. Something similar was the main idea of communism at the beginning. In the perfect world without any conflict, everyone would have to live by the same rules, have equal rights and the same lifestyle. Still, there is a problem with this type of life and it lies in the efforts of society and individuals. For example, a person who goes to college would not have a better financial life than the person who did not go to college, thus the individual effort to stand out would be pointless.
<u>To conclude, world peace is possible in theory, but it is almost impossible to have it in practice.</u>
