1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Nezavi [6.7K]
3 years ago
10

How did the excommunication of Emperor Leo III affect the Roman Empire during the eighth century?

History
2 answers:
Darina [25.2K]3 years ago
7 0

Ultimately, the excommunication of Emperor Leo III of Syria led to major tensions between the East and West as it forced the issue between the Eastern and Western Churches of the veneration of icons. Ultimately, a truce did emerge but major tensions continued to exist between the two branches of what was originally the Roman Catholic Church.

lora16 [44]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

The answer would be A, I just took the test.

You might be interested in
Which case would the Supreme Court hear through its original jurisdiction power? a state that sues another for violating interst
Dimas [21]

____________________________________________________

Answer:

Your answer would be A). a state that sues another for violating interstate trade

____________________________________________________

The case that the Supreme Court would hear through its original jurisdiction power is a state that sues another for violating interstate trade.

____________________________________________________

Definitions:

Jurisdiction power:

Jurisdiction power is the power for the jury to hear a case for the first time, this means that the court is the first to hear about the case.

____________________________________________________

Explanation:

The reason why answer choice "A).  a state that sues another for violating interstate trad" is the correct answer because this is a big case that needs to be sent to the Supreme Court as soon as possible.

This is a cause that wouldn't be seen first by the lower courts, or courts that are below the ranking of the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court would use its jurisdiction power to hear this case first. A state suing another state involves the government, since they're the ones that have the power to sue for the state. This case would pretty much involve the government, which the Supreme Court needs to make sure that it could be solved as soon as possible. Interstate trade is pretty much known as trades that are from one state to another state, and in the answer, it's saying that a state is suing another state for violating state to state trading. Trading is very important in the U.S, and it's more important to get trades from other fellow states, if there is a problem between the states, it needs to be focused on to reduce the tension of hatred.

____________________________________________________

Why the other answer choices are incorrect:

The reason why answer choice "B). a man convicted of a crime based on false evidence " is incorrect because:

This is the type of case that would first be seen by the lower courts, and doesn't need to Supreme Court to be involved, since this is a case that would happy in a local community. The community court will deal with this case first. This is the reason why this answer choice would be eliminated.

The reason why answer choice "C). a teacher prohibited from praying in a school cafeteria" is incorrect because:

This is another case that would be first seen the the lower court, or local court. This is also a case that doesn't need the Supreme Court to be involved in. The lower court will deal with these types of cases, since it's not ideal to the whole country. This is the reason why this answer choice would be eliminated.

The reason why answer choice "D). a reporter whose First Amendment rights are violated" is incorrect because:

This is also another case that would first be seen the the lower courts. If someone's amendment rights were violated, then they would see a local court. They wouldn't see the Supreme Court be cause the Supreme Court wouldn't want to deal with a case like this, since it's not their job to deal with a case like that, that's the job for the lower courts. This is the reason why this answer choice would be eliminated.

If you see the trend, all of the answer choices are wrong because they do not need the involvement of the Supreme Court for the case. Those types of cases should be dealt with the lower courts; they're the ones that are suppose to see this case first.

____________________________________________________

<em>-Julie</em>

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
1. Which European country possessed the most colonies? Which possessed the least?
babunello [35]

Answer: Spain possessed the most of them at the very beginning of the colonization (till the 1st half of the 19th century), Britain possessed the most of them at the end of colonization. Denmark possessed the least and for a very limited period of time. Portugal was the first country to possess colonies and the last country that decolonized its territories (1970s) but the in comparison to Spain or Britain, its colonies were less extensive.

Explanation: it depends very much what period we are focused on. So the question is not so easy to answer. In the 16th, 17th and 18th century it was Spain that possessed the most colonies. With the decolonization of South America and Central America and with the territorial expansion of the USA during the 19th century situation changes. For the growth of the British cololonial system, 18th century (Seven Years´ War) was crucial...at that time Britain eliminated its rival, France, from its significant position. Then, the Britain maintained the first position. On the other extreme there are less significant colonial powers: the Dutch and especially Danes.

4 0
3 years ago
Human rights groups in the 20th century worked to:
Ilia_Sergeevich [38]
They were engaged in activism
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
what was the conflict between native americans and the U.S government relating to western lands? How did this conflict get resol
puteri [66]
The conflict arose because the US citizens wanted to spread towards the western shores and pushed the Natives out of their land and forced them to migrate. The conflict didn't get resolved since there was war and fighting because many didn't want to go, but in the end they were placed in reservations.
5 0
3 years ago
In the 1400s, who expanded Inca territory by using military might and building alliances with neighbors?
Sidana [21]
Emperor Montezuma 111
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which traits characterize a laissez-faire capitalist economic system
    7·1 answer
  • How does this help to explain the variations in dissemination of chinese culture among the regions?
    9·1 answer
  • Which helped Democrats regain control of the House of Representatives in 1874?
    9·1 answer
  • The Mughal Empire was established by who
    8·1 answer
  • Who was Jehu Grant?
    15·2 answers
  • In addition to rivers, the most common method of moving people and goods in Central Africa is by _____.
    10·2 answers
  • Why was alfred wegener unable to prove his theory
    9·1 answer
  • The Antifederalists opposed the ratification of the Constitution because the New Constitution _________
    14·1 answer
  • What are at least 2 examples of how individual Rights impact our social, political, and economic systems? Provide 2 examples for
    11·2 answers
  • Can yall help me my brain is being slow
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!