Answer:
I would say the first one
Explanation:
An example for that question is: Who among the population would be satisfied with the global handicap?
Surely, the government admnistrators would feel most accomplished and relieved living in a world where nobody holds the wits, brawn, or beauty to challenge their positions. After all, in any society, someone must stand out above all the others to be a successful ruler. But regarding the populace, would it be possible for anyone to feel satisfied with this imposed lifestyle? Or would it be considered too "ingenious" to feel otherwise?
For some, this could be an utopia; For the to-be handicapped, it is opression.
Answer:
Absolutely
Explanation:
Anyone who has any integrity and knows that Hitler was being cruel towards the Jews would take in the Franks.
<span>d. to lend credibility and additional support to their conclusion
The missing quotation was:
</span><span>"If morality represents the way we would like the world to work and economics represents how it actually does work, then the story of Feldman's bagel business lies at the very intersection of morality and economics. Yes, a lot of people steal from him, but the vast majority, even though no is watching over them, do not. This outcome may surprise some people—including Feldman's economist friends, who counseled him twenty years ago that his honor-system scheme would never work. But it would not have surprised Adam Smith. In fact, theme of Smith's first book, the Theory of Moral Sentiments, was the innate honesty of mankind. "How selfish soever man may be supposed," Smith wrote, "there are evidently some principles in his nature which interest him in the fortune of others, and render their happiness necessary to him, though he derives nothing from it, except the pleasure of seeing it."</span>
D.) A Request For Comments From Yogo Fans
or
B.) A Poll To Find Readers' Favorite Yoga Pose
