1- Pros of Erie Canal:
- Facilitated the migration to the Northwest great farm land
- Contributed in the revolution of transportation
- NYC harbor became the most important port in North America
2- Cons of the Erie canal:
- The south became isolated as the north was able to get the crops from the NW
- Expensive
- Did not help in the creation of the canal revolution that was predicted by Clinton
The FEMA website would be more likely to have accurate information than an outside source.
The FEMA website, being a government source, would report their data and information and accurately as possible.
Outside sources regarding FEMA would contain bias, personal experience, and potentially slanted data. FEMA could have misrepresented data but they answer to the government and the people of the country, whereas outside sources answer to an organization or business. Outside sources would need to be corroborated to verify the information. Though all sources should be verified and corroborated, typically government sources are most accurate.
I think b makes the most sense. The press would have most likely helped many Protestants share their works easier, such as Martin Luther with the 95 theses.
